<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Uncommon Ground</title>
        <link>http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/</link>
        <description>Reflections on academics, the environment, and biodiversity</description>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:55:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
        
        <item>
            <title>Fourteen questions</title>
            <description><![CDATA[ <div class="content-image-float" style="width: 216px;"><a href="http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/images/sciencedebate2008BLOGGER.html" onclick="window.open('http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/images/sciencedebate2008BLOGGER.html','popup','width=216,height=50,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/images/sciencedebate2008BLOGGER-thumb-216x50.gif" alt="sciencedebate2008BLOGGER.gif" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left;" width="216" /></a></div> As we all know by now, neither the Republican nor the Democratic candidates for their respective party's nominations accepted invitations to participate in ScienceDebate2008. But that doesn't mean the idea's dead. Far from it.

Today the ScienceDebate2008 team released <a href="http://www.sciencedebate2008.com/www/index.php?id=35">Innovation 2008: 14 Questions the candidates for President should answer about Science &amp; America's Future</a>.<br /><br /><blockquote>On behalf of the American science and innovation community (<a href="http://www.sciencedebate2008.com/www/index.php?id=7">see who here</a>),
we have submitted these questions to the candidates for President and
asked them to do two simple things: A) provide a written response,
which we will publish here, and B) discuss these questions in a
nationally televised forum. <br /></blockquote>The 14 questions asked of presidential candidates include the <a href="http://sharp.sefora.org/innovation2008/#questions">7 questions</a> asked of congressional candidates. You can find out how your representatives, senators, and their challengers answered the questions by entering your zip code in the Innovation 2008 box at the bottom of the page. <br /><br />David Goldston <a href="http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/02/debating_sciencedebate2008.html">had doubts</a> about earlier incarnations of ScienceDebate2008, and his doubts caused me some doubts of my own. But after looking at the 14 questions that have been posted, I am really looking forward to the answers. They will tell us a lot about our next president.<sup>1</sup> <br />]]></description>
            <link>http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/07/fourteen_questions.html</link>
            <guid>http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/07/fourteen_questions.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Politics</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">ScienceDebate2008</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:55:43 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>The Lenski-Conservapaedia controversy</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Readers of this blog have probably already heard about the spat between Rich Lenski and Conservapaedia in which Rich gives Conservapaedia a good lesson in how science works.<sup>1</sup> What you may not know is that Andrew Sullivan, author of "The Conservative Soul" among other books, had this to say about it at the <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/07/the-far-right-v.html">Daily Dish</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote>More evidence of the rotting of the right's brain. Conservapedia objects to the finding that a bacteria strain <a target="_blank" href="http://arstechnica.com/articles/culture/conservapedias-evolutionary-foibles.ars">evolved
</a>the ability to better utilize sugar over 20 years.<br /></blockquote>"Rotting of the right's brain", or if not the whole right, at least those who run Conservapaedia. Writing at <a href="http://arstechnica.com/articles/culture/conservapedias-evolutionary-foibles.ars">ArsTechnica</a> John Timmer notes<br /><br /><blockquote>Problems with group think and incendiary discussions are common
complaints about what happens behind the scenes at Wikipedia. The irony
here is that Conservapedia was ostensibly founded as a response to
precisely that behavior. It appears that the victims may now be trying
the role of oppressors on for size.
<br /></blockquote><br />]]></description>
            <link>http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/07/the_lenskiconservapaedia_contr.html</link>
            <guid>http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/07/the_lenskiconservapaedia_contr.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Creationism</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Politics</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 06:49:54 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>A forum on opportunities in ecology</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="cary-forum-opportunities.gif" src="http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/images/cary-forum-opportunities.gif" class="mt-image-left" style="margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt; float: left;" width="192" height="995" /></span> The <a href="http://www.ecostudies.org/">Cary Institute of Ecosystems Studies</a> is holding a forum this Tuesday, 8 July, from 9:00am - 3:00pm designed to provide undergraduate and graduate students the opportunity to learn more about the career paths open to those who are trained in ecology. In the morning, speakers will discuss the rewards and motivations of their work. In the afternoon, speakers will join small groups of students for informal discussions.<br /><br />The forum is open to all students without charge. Those interested in the afternoon program should register by calling Pat Zolnik, REU Program Coordinator, at (845) 677-7600 ext. 326.<br /><br />The <a href="http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/supplements/2008-Cary-Forum-Flyer.doc">forum flyer</a> and a <a href="http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/supplements/Cary-Forum-08-schedule-of-speakers.doc">schedule of speakers</a> are available here in Microsoft Word format.<br />]]></description>
            <link>http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/06/a_forum_on_opportunities_in_ec.html</link>
            <guid>http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/06/a_forum_on_opportunities_in_ec.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Miscellaneous</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 09:01:32 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>European plants and climate change</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<span style="padding: 5px; float: left;"><a href="http://www.researchblogging.org/"><img alt="ResearchBlogging.org" src="http://www.researchblogging.org/images/rbicons/ResearchBlogging-Medium-Trans.png" width="80" height="50" /></a></span> In January I wrote about <a href="http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/01/european_birds_and_climate_cha.html">European birds and climate change</a>. The paper I summarized there projected how the distribution of European birds might change over the next century in response to changes in the European climate. But we don't have to wait to see the effects of climate change. <a href="http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2007/10/from_the_arbord.html">Plant hardiness zones</a> in the United States have moved northward in the last sixteen years, and today there's a paper in <i><a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/320/5884/1768">Science</a></i> showing that European plants are moving up the mountains as the climate in Europe gets warmer.<br /><br /><div class="content-image-float" style="width: 300px;"><br /><img alt="Changes in the distribution center of European plants" src="http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/images/320_1768_F2.jpeg" class="mt-image-left" style="margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt; float: left;" width="300" height="296" /><small>Changes in the distribution center of west European plants. Triangles indicate species for which the change is statisitcally significant. (<a href="http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/images/320_1768_F2.jpeg">full-size image</a>; From Lenoir et al. <i><a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/320/5884/1768">Science </a></i>320:1768-1771; 2008)</small></div> Lenoir and colleagues collated data from almost 4000 floristic surveys in western Europe, spanning the full elevational range from 0 to 2600m above sea level. Using these data they used statistical methods to determine the elevation at which each species was most likely to occur in surveys conducted between 1905 and 1985 (the x-axis in the plot to the left) and in surveys conducted since 1985 (the y-axis). Of the 171 species included in their sample, 46 showed statistically significant shifts in the elevation at which they were most likely to occur. Of those 46, 41 showed an upward shift in elevation. Only 5 showed a downward shift.&nbsp; "More than two-thirds (118/171) of the species shifted their optima upward, whereas only one-third (53/171) shifted their optima downward." Overall, the elevation at which these species were most likely to occur shifted upward almost 30m per decade - the length of an American football field since 1985.]]></description>
            <link>http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/06/european_plants_and_climate_ch.html</link>
            <guid>http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/06/european_plants_and_climate_ch.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Climate change</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:51:39 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>The economics of biodiversity loss</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.cbd.int/cop9/">COP 9</a><sup>1</sup> finished over three weeks ago. I'm just learning now that the European Commission presented a report titled "The economics of ecosystems &amp; biodiversity" to the conference. <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/may/30/biodiversity.conservation">The Guardian</a> summarized the report this way:<br /><br /><blockquote>The steeply accelerating decline of the natural world is already
costing hundreds of billions of pounds a year, say leading economists,
in a review of the costs and benefits of forests, rivers and marine
life. The losses will increase dramatically over the next generation
unless urgent remedial action is taken, they say.<br /></blockquote>The full report is available <a href="http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/biodiversity/economics/pdf/teeb_report.pdf">on-line</a>. Hie thee forth and read it.<sup>2</sup>]]></description>
            <link>http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/06/the_economics_of_biodiversity.html</link>
            <guid>http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/06/the_economics_of_biodiversity.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Biodiversity</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:42:10 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Don&apos;t know much about psychology</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<span style="padding: 5px; float: left;"><a href="http://www.researchblogging.org/"><img alt="ResearchBlogging.org" src="http://www.researchblogging.org/images/rbicons/ResearchBlogging-Medium-Trans.png" width="80" height="50" /></a></span> I don't know much about psychology,<sup>1</sup> but I've always been fascinated by what psychologists are able to tell us about ourselves and the way we think. Now there's a paper from<a href="http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/105/25/8552"> Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</a> showing that the activities we engage influence our cognitive styles. Specifically, the authors show that members of farming and fishing communities in eastern Turkey have a more "holistic" cognitive style than members of herding communities in the same area who have a more "analytic" style of thought. They assert that farming and fishing communities "emphasize harmonious<sup> </sup>social interdependence" and that herding communities "emphasize individual<sup> </sup>decision making and foster social independence."<br /><br />Holistic thought is characterized by attention to the whole perceptual field. Objects or events are explained by their relationships to the whole field.<br /><br />Analytic thought is characterized by attention to the characteristics of objects and events. Objects or events are explained by generic rules about the category to which they belong and by generic rules associated with those categories.<sup>2</sup><br /><br />The authors argue that "these culturally divergent modes of thought are encouraged by the degree to which the culture's social practices reinforce either independence of the self from others or interdependence of the self with others."<br />How did they reach these conclusions? Well, they performed a surprisingly simple experiment.
]]></description>
            <link>http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/06/dont_know_much_about_psycholog.html</link>
            <guid>http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/06/dont_know_much_about_psycholog.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Miscellaneous</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Research blogging</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:27:49 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Citation analysis and impact factors</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="impact.png" src="http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/images/impact.png" class="mt-image-left" style="margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt; float: left;" width="500" height="258" /></span> The Joint Committee on Quantitative Assessment of Research of the International Mathematical Union, the International Council of Industrial and Applied Mathematics, and the Institutes of Statistics has just released a <a href="http://www.mathunion.org/fileadmin/IMU/Report/CitationStatistics.pdf">report on citation statistics</a>.<sup>1</sup> As academic readers are well aware, Thomson Scientific (formerly the Institute for Scientific Information) has for many years used its database to provide rankings of journals (impact factors) and even of scientists (see, for example, <a href="http://isihighlycited.com/">http://isihighlycited.com/</a>). Many authors have criticized impact factors and simple citation counts. Some have proposed other indices based on the same statistics. Here's what the authors conclude.<br /><br /><blockquote>We do not dismiss citation statistics as a tool for assessing the quality of research--citation data and statistics can provide some valuable information. We recognize that assessment must be practical, and for this reason easily‐derived citation statistics almost surely will be part of the process. But citation data provide only a limited and incomplete view of research quality, and the statistics derived from citation data are sometimes poorly understood and misused. Research is too important to measure its value with only a single coarse tool.<br /></blockquote><br />]]></description>
            <link>http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/06/citation_analysis_and_impact_f.html</link>
            <guid>http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/06/citation_analysis_and_impact_f.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Scholarly communication</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:50:03 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>The E.P.A., California, and carbon dioxide</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Remember how the State of California <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21691277/">sued</a> the Environmental Protection Agency last November to force a decision on whether it could get a waiver to impose CO<sub>2</sub> emissions standards on cars and light trucks?<br /><br /><blockquote>The EPA initially refused to act on
California's application, saying the agency did not have the authority
to regulate greenhouse gases as a pollutant. That changed when the U.S.
Supreme Court ruled in April that the EPA did indeed have that right.<br /></blockquote><br /><blockquote><p class="textBodyBlack"><span id="byLine"></span>As
a result, the EPA is now developing greenhouse gas regulations that are
scheduled to be released by the end of the year. Environmental groups
say those regulations are unlikely to be stronger than California
standards.</p></blockquote><p class="textBodyBlack">That was November. In this morning's <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/25/washington/25epa.html">New York Times</a> we read this:</p><blockquote><p class="textBodyBlack">The White House in December refused to accept the <a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/e/environmental_protection_agency/index.html?inline=nyt-org" title="More articles about the Environmental Protection Agency.">Environmental Protection Agency</a>'s
conclusion that greenhouse gases are pollutants that must be
controlled, telling agency officials that an e-mail message containing
the document would not be opened, senior E.P.A. officials said last
week.</p><p class="textBodyBlack">The document, which ended up in e-mail limbo, without official status, was the E.P.A.'s answer to a 2007 <a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/s/supreme_court/index.html?inline=nyt-org" title="More articles about the U.S. Supreme Court.">Supreme Court</a>
ruling that required it to determine whether greenhouse gases represent
a danger to health or the environment, the officials said.</p></blockquote><p class="textBodyBlack">Senior officials at the E.P.A., speaking on condition of anonymity, say that the document referred to above <br /></p><blockquote><p class="textBodyBlack">"showed that the Clean Air Act can work for certain sectors of the
economy, to reduce greenhouse gases," one of the senior E.P.A.
officials said. "That's not what the administration wants to show. They
want to show that the Clean Air Act can't work."</p></blockquote><p class="textBodyBlack">There is room for disagreement about how the government should regulate greenhouse gas emissions, and it is appropriate for political values to play a role in making policy choices. Indeed, political values <i>have</i> to play a role in making policy choices.<sup>1</sup> But...</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/06/the_epa_california_and_carbon.html</link>
            <guid>http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/06/the_epa_california_and_carbon.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Science and public policy</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 07:03:11 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Why I&apos;m not in Minneapolis</title>
            <description><![CDATA[The annual meetings of the Society for the Study of Evolution, the American Society of Naturalists, and the Society of Systematic Biologists are happening right now in Minneapolis -- <a href="http://www.cce.umn.edu/conferences/evolution/">Evolution 2008</a>. I'm really sorry not to be there. I've only missed the Evolution meetings three or four times in the last 20 years. I always learn a lot. I'm especially sorry to miss the meetings this year, because one of my students, Rachel Prunier, is giving a talk this morning (in about an hour and a half). She's put a lot of work into her talk, and I'm sure it will be great. I'm sorry I can't be there to support her.<br /><br />If you happen to be reading this from Minneapolis and haven't decided what you're going to see this morning (or even if you have), get yourself over to Anderson 270 for the 8:00am talk entitled "Genetic differentiation of white proteas in the western Cape, South Africa." You won't be disappointed. After that you're free to see whatever talks interest you.&nbsp; ]]></description>
            <link>http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/06/why_im_not_in_minneapolis.html</link>
            <guid>http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/06/why_im_not_in_minneapolis.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Personal</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 07:20:30 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Year of Evolution</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<div class="content-image-float" style="width: 300px;"><img alt="Year of Science 2009" src="http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/images/yos09-405x130.gif" class="mt-image-left" style="margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt; float: left;" width="300" /></div> In 2009 the world will celebrate the bicentennial of Darwin's birth, the 150 anniversary of the publication of &lt;em&gt;On the Origin of Species&lt;/em&gt;, the 400th anniversary of the publication of Kepler's first two laws of planetary motion, and many other significant events in the history of science. In recognition, the <a href="http://www.copusproject.org/">Coalition on the Public Understanding of Science</a>, an informal coalition involving more than 260 scientific societies and institutions, is coordinating the <a href="http://www.copusproject.org/yearofscience2009/">Year of Science 2009</a> -- <strong>a national year-long celebration of science</strong> to engage
the public in science and improve public understanding about how
science works, why it matters, and who scientists are. 2009 will also be the <a href="http://www.astronomy2009.org/">International Year of Astronomy</a> and the <a href="http://www.yearofplanetearth.org/">International Year for Planet Earth</a>. And now the city of Philadelphia is planning a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/23/us/23darwin.html">Year of Evolution</a>.<br /><br /><blockquote>Nine academic, scientific and cultural institutions around the city are
holding a Year of Evolution, a series of exhibitions, seminars and
lectures to celebrate the 200th anniversary of the birth of <a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/d/charles_robert_darwin/index.html?inline=nyt-per" title="More articles about Charles Robert Darwin.">Charles Darwin</a> next February, and the 150th anniversary of the publication of his seminal work, "The Origin of Species."<br /></blockquote>It looks as if 2009 is going to be a very exciting year.<br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/06/year_of_evolution.html</link>
            <guid>http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/06/year_of_evolution.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Communicating science</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Year of Science 2009</category>
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 06:58:47 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Defend science in Louisiana</title>
            <description><![CDATA[I've <a href="http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/06/bad_news_in_louisiana.html">written before</a> about the "academic freedom" bill in Louisiana. It's now sitting on the desk of Louisiana's governor awaiting his signature. Barbara Forrest has released a letter asking for help convincing the governor asking him to veto the bill. Click through for the text of Barbara's letter and contact information.<br />]]></description>
            <link>http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/06/defend_science_in_louisiana.html</link>
            <guid>http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/06/defend_science_in_louisiana.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Creationism</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:32:29 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>FOX News and Louisiana</title>
            <description><![CDATA[I mentioned the <a href="http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/06/bad_news_in_louisiana.html">bad news in Louisiana</a> earlier today. <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2008/06/louisiana_heading_for_creation.php">Greg Laden</a> links to the story from <a href="http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/louisiana-house-passes-academic-freedom-evolution-science-issues/">FOX news</a>. What he doesn't mention is that the "news" story from FOX News appears to be a verbatim copy of the <a href="http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/supplements/discovery-institute-2008-06012.html">press release</a> on the Discovery Institute website.<sup>1</sup><br /><br />The clue? This footer at the bottom of the FOX News article:<br /><br />SOURCE Discovery Institute <pre>http://www.discovery.org <br />Copyright (<a href="javascript:stockSearch('C');">C</a><span id="q_0_0">: </span><span id="q_0_1" dqsym="c" class="dqPrice dqUpTic"> 20.03, </span><span id="q_0_2" class="dqNetChg dqUp dqUpTic">+0.82, +4.26%</span>) 2008 PR Newswire. All rights reserved</pre><br />Don't you think it would be a good idea for FOX News to label press releases as press releases?<br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/06/fox_news_and_louisiana.html</link>
            <guid>http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/06/fox_news_and_louisiana.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Creationism</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:36:30 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Bad news in Louisiana</title>
            <description><![CDATA[I am sorry to report that the Louisiana House of Representatives <a href="http://www.nola.com/newsflash/index.ssf?/base/news-39/1213222164265360.xml&amp;storylist=louisiana">passed Senate Bill 733</a> yesterday.<sup>1</sup> As the American Institute of Biological Sciences <a href="http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/06/bad_science_in_louisiana.html">pointed out</a> in a letter distributed to all Louisiana legislators<br /><br /><blockquote>SB 733 would require that teachers consider and accept non-scientific
explanations for natural phenomena, including evolution, the origins of
life, and global warming.&nbsp; Supernatural explanations for these
phenomena are not scientifically testable and are not science.<br /></blockquote>The vote in the House was 94-3.]]></description>
            <link>http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/06/bad_news_in_louisiana.html</link>
            <guid>http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/06/bad_news_in_louisiana.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Creationism</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 09:50:16 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>A call for action on climate change</title>
            <description><![CDATA[A couple of weeks ago, the Union of Concerned Scientists released a <a href="http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science/2008scientists_letter.html">statement</a> calling on "U.S. policy makers to put our nation onto a path today to
reduce emissions on the order of 80 percent below 2000 levels by 2050.
The first step on this path should be reductions on the order of 15-20
percent below 2000 levels by 2020, which is achievable and consistent
with sound economic policy."

<br /><br />On Tuesday, "the academies of the Group of 8 industrialized countries -- Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia and the United States -- and of Brazil, China, India, Mexico and South Africa called on the industrialized countries to lead a 'transition to a low-carbon society' and aggressively move to limit impacts from changes in climate that are already under way and impossible to stop" (<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/11/world/11climate.html">source</a>).<br /><br />Too bad Congress <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/07/washington/07climate.html">isn't listening</a>.<br />]]></description>
            <link>http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/06/a_call_for_action_on_climate_c.html</link>
            <guid>http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/06/a_call_for_action_on_climate_c.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Climate change</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:07:20 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Gene banks and agriculture</title>
            <description><![CDATA[You've probably heard of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heirloom_tomato">heirloom tomatoes</a>. They're becoming increasingly popular because they offer interesting alternatives to the typical beefsteak tomato.<sup>1</sup> Heirloom varieties are just one example of the interest gardeners increasingly show in conserving some of the great variety of fruits and vegetables that have been grown. But gardeners' efforts are only a small part of the story.<br /><br /><blockquote>Congress established a system of repositories after World War II to
maintain and distribute plant genetic resources. This resource has now
grown into the National Plant Germplasm System (NPGS; <a href="http://www.csrees.usda.gov/nea/plants/in_focus/pbgg_if_npgs.html">http:<wbr alt="​" style="content: attr(alt);">/<wbr alt="​" style="content: attr(alt);">/www.csrees.usda.gov<wbr alt="​" style="content: attr(alt);">/nea<wbr alt="​" style="content: attr(alt);">/plants<wbr alt="​" style="content: attr(alt);">/in_focus<wbr alt="​" style="content: attr(alt);">/pbgg_if_npgs.html</a>)
and consists of 26 repositories with approximately half a million
individual collections. The NPGS functions to maintain agricultural
biodiversity and ensure the preservation of the genetic resources
needed for food security and environmental restoration. <br />...<br />There is little doubt that plant genetic resources are needed to
address today's problems. Yet the erosion of plant biodiversity
continues a decline that had already begun even as Frank Meyer traveled
the globe in search of botanical resources to benefit society. Seed
bank collections serve as insurance against unanticipated future
threats to food security, the degradation of our environment, and the
loss of plant biodiversity. The WRPIS, as part of the US network of
plant gene banks, provides a vital link in an emerging world system
aimed at maintaining, conserving, and utilizing these precious plant
genetic resources, the seeds of our future. (R.C. Johnson, <a href="http://biology.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&amp;doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0060148">PloS Biology</a>)<br /></blockquote> ]]></description>
            <link>http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/06/gene_banks_and_agriculture.html</link>
            <guid>http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/uncommon-ground/archives/2008/06/gene_banks_and_agriculture.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Biodiversity</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:10:34 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>
