
Today it becomes official. I wrote
last month that I agreed to serve as Interim Vice Provost for Graduate Education and Dean of the Graduate School. My appointment becomes official today, although I've spent a fair amount of time over the last month becoming familiar with people and operations in the Graduate School (and dealing with a problem or two). After my last post, I heard comments from a few people that made me want to clarify why I agreed to take on this new role.
First, the
University of Connecticut has been good to me. When I joined the faculty in August, 1986, I didn't expect to stay in Connecticut more than a few years. Even though I've now lived here more than a quarter of a century, I still think of myself as a westerner, born and bred. I was born in Oregon City, Oregon, but other than one very dim memory of Sacramento, California when my father was in his medical internship, all of my memories growing up are from the small town of
Burley, Idaho. I went to college at the
College of Idaho (in Caldwell), received my Ph.D. from Stanford and did post-doctoral work at
UC Berkeley and
UC Davis. I'd spent a grand total of two weeks east of the Mississippi before moving here, and most of that was on job interviews. But Connecticut is home. I have many wonderful colleagues in this department, and I've been able to grow and develop professionally here in ways I don't think I could have elsewhere.
So when Peter Nicholls asked me to step up and serve the University in this positon, how could I refuse? I owe the University at least this much.
Second (quoting from my earlier post),
As I've told a few close friends, I think of myself as mediocre in
research. My record of external funding is pitiful compared to those I
regard as leaders in evolutionary biology, and my intellectual
contributions have occurred at the margins of important topics, not at
the center. In contrast, I think of myself as a talented and effective
leader.
That's the comment that needs some clarification.
The past 4-5 years have been the most productive and satisfying years
for research of my entire career -- thanks largely to the extremely
talented group of people I've been fortunate to work with. But I think I might be even more effective as a dean. I think I have an ability to work
with other people that's unusually strong (at least for an academic). I
seem to be able to identify the strengths and weaknesses people have,
to feed their strengths and starve their weaknesses, to mediate
disputes, to foster collaborations, to remain even-tempered when
situations get tense, to defuse tensions when they arise, to ensure that
all people are treated fairly, and to make connections for myself and
others. In short, I think I'm more talented at helping others get real
work done than I am in doing real work myself. Now I have a chance to find out.