More thoughts about Merck & Elsevier

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks | View blog reactions
First El Naschie, then an undisclosed relationship with Merck to publish what were essentially product advertisements masquerading as a scholarly journal. Here's what Richard Gallagher writing at The Scientist has to say:

Kudos to Elsevier [for admitting their mistake]. But they need to go further.

They need to provide the names of the sponsors of the six faux journals. Who besides Merck colluded in "unacceptable practice"?

They should also release financial information. I'd like to know the price that bought the integrity of one of the leading science publishers.

At that point, I'll be happy to accept that "the integrity of Elsevier's publications and business practices remains intact," as the Elsevier spokesperson maintains. I know Elsevier from the inside--they gave me my first job in publishing.


No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1965

Leave a comment

 Subscribe in a reader

Recent Entries

There must be something in the water
I've written more about communicating science than any other topic, or so it appears from the category listing on the…
Scientific illiteracy
One message of my address as President of the Botanical Society of America was that the problem with science literacy…
Some good news and a little publicity
A couple of months ago one of my students, Kathryn Theiss, received word that she'd been awarded a fellowship from…
Nature Blog Network View blog authority