Denyse O'Leary and winning

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks | View blog reactions
Larry Moran quotes this excerpt from a recent O'Leary post at Uncommon Descent:

Having reported news on the ID scene for about five years now, I could give a number of reasons why I think ID is slowly winning the intellectual battle, but let me focus on just one for now ...

Let's see, didn't Michael Medved tell us recently that "intelligent design is not a theory"? And last year didn't Philip Johnson reveal that "I also don't think that there is really a theory of intelligent design at the present time"?

That's winning? When two of your strongest supporters admit that you don't even have a theory? Boy, the sixties must have been good to Denyse.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1724

Leave a comment

 Subscribe in a reader

Recent Entries

A swine flu survey
Carl Zimmer points to a study on swine flu psychology that needs participants.As you have heard in the news, there…
Suppressing evidence
From Andy Revkin a few days ago.For more than a decade the Global Climate Coalition, a group representing industries with…
Who does climate change hurt?
From the Center for Climate Change Communication at George Mason University Based on a nationally representative survey of 2,164 American…
Nature Blog Network View blog authority