Judgment day – Intelligent design on trial

| 0 Comments | 7 TrackBacks | View blog reactions
Conflict between religion and science has rarely been of more concern. Whereas the rhetoric of Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris and others has little measurable effect, the outcome of a juryless trial in a two-bit Pennsylvania town in 2005 had a profound impact on how science is taught throughout the United States, and beyond. The parents of 11 pupils at the only high school in Dover launched a legal challenge to prevent the teaching of intelligent design as an alternative to evolution by natural selection. There followed thefts, fires, death threats, a media sensation and a robust verdict. (Adam Rutherford, Nature 450:170; 2007).

Judgment day tells the story of the Dover trial. It airs tonight at 8:00pm on most PBS stations.1 Once again, Cornelia Dean getis it just right:

Though prominent intelligent design theorists and their allies speak on camera, and their testimony, like that of the scientists, is re-enacted (no cameras were allowed in court), the program as a whole recognizes that there is no credible scientific challenge to the theory of evolution as an explanation for the complexity and diversity of life on earth. (“Battlefield Report From the Evolution War,” New York Times, 11 November 2007)

Let me put that last phrase in bold. It's worth repeating and re-emphasizing: “there is no credible scientific challenge to the theory of evolution as an explanation for the complexity and diversity of life on earth.

Right on schedule the Discorvery Institute has launched intelligentdesign.org.2 They're good at putting up websites, but they don't do science. Don't believe me? Here's what Philip “Father of Intelligent Design” Johnson has to say:

I also don't think that there is really a theory of intelligent design at the present time to propose as a comparable alternative to the Darwinian theory, which is, whatever errors it might contain, a fully worked out scheme. There is no intelligent design theory that's comparable. Working out a positive theory is the job of the scientific people that we have affiliated with the movement. Some of them are quite convinced that it's doable, but that's for them to prove...No product is ready for competition in the educational world. (from an interview with the Bereley Sceince Review, quoted at Panda's Thumb).

There you have it, from the father of intelligent design creationism himself: there is no credible alternative to the theory of evolution.


1If you're in Connecticut, CPTV is airing it at 9:00pm. The NOVA at 8:00pm is about a family that walks on all fours. WGBH is airing it at 8:00pm.
2I'm not going to contribute to raising the Google ranks of those sites by linking to them.

7 TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1551

P.Z. Myers points out that the Discovery Institute has its predictable “rebuttal” of Judgment Day. Their eight-point rebuttal is, as he says, picking nits. But I think he's wrong about it missing the point of the program entirely. Basically... Read More

You may know that Florida's State Board of Education recently adopted new science education standards that require students to learn about the “scientific theory of evolution.” (Here's a report from MSNBC.) Here's how First Coast News (Jack... Read More

Expelled opened last Friday. On Saturday Friendly Atheist linked to a piece by Nikki Finke in the LA Weekly, quoting this passage approvingly: Playing in 1,052 theaters, the pic distributed by Rocky Mountain Pictures fell over the weekend from 8th... Read More

Chris Bertram calls it "outright gibberish". Intellectual quackery is how I'd describe it. Describe what you ask? Intelligent design creationism. And calling it quackery isn't my idea. Read Steven Poole's review of "Dissent Over Descent: Intelligent De... Read More

Ed Brayton links to an interview with Michael Medved1 in the Jerusalem Post. (Paragraphs in bold are from the Ruthie Blum, the journalist conducting the interview.)[Y]ou are a senior fellow at the Discovery Institute that studies and believes in Intell... Read More

Larry Moran quotes this excerpt from a recent O'Leary post at Uncommon Descent:Having reported news on the ID scene for about five years now, I could give a number of reasons why I think ID is slowly winning the intellectual... Read More

In December 2005 the Honorable Judge John E. Jones, III wrote:A significant aspect of the IDM [intelligent design movement] is that despite Defendants' protestations to the contrary, it describes ID as a religious argument. In that vein, the writings o... Read More

Leave a comment

 Subscribe in a reader

Recent Entries

A swine flu survey
Carl Zimmer points to a study on swine flu psychology that needs participants.As you have heard in the news, there…
Suppressing evidence
From Andy Revkin a few days ago.For more than a decade the Global Climate Coalition, a group representing industries with…
Who does climate change hurt?
From the Center for Climate Change Communication at George Mason University Based on a nationally representative survey of 2,164 American…
Nature Blog Network View blog authority