Complications - I

| No Comments | 1 TrackBack
Share |
Arctic September Sea Ice Extent: Observations ...

Image via Wikipedia

Yesterday I argued that the IPCC should hire some professionals to help it communicate its findings to the public and policy makers. There are two complications: (1) Many scientists regard a communications strategy as "fluff" and "spin". (2) Effective communication requires a coherent message.

Let's talk about "fluff" and "spin".

As scientists, we're trained to collect and analyze data. We use those data to evaluate hypotheses and to refine our understanding of the world. If the data we collect are inconsistent with what we thought we understood, we modify our understanding. This approach can be summed up in two words: Data rule.

If data rule, then how they're communicated don't matter. It's the data that determine whether our ideas are right, not how flashy our PowerPoint is or how cool our graphics are. If the extent of Arctic sea ice is decreasing faster than expected, it doesn't make any difference if I draw a pretty picture or simply print a big table of numbers. What matters is what the data say. In fact, you could argue that the table of numbers is better, because it allows you to make quantitative rather than qualitative comparisons of the data and what's expected.

Daniel Kahneman, Dan Lovallo, and Olivier Sibany would point out1 that this reflects only one of two modes of human thinking, what cognitive scientists call "reflective thinking". The other mode of thinking, "intuitive thinking" mostly determines our thoughts. It "produces a constant representation of the world around us". It's that representation of the world that determines how we respond.2

That's where the communications professionals come in. They live and breathe in a world that's focused on affecting our intuitive thinking, not our reflective thinking. And there's a science, or at least an art, to doing that well.

Most people, even most policy makers, don't have the time to study the data and findings of the IPCC in detail.3 Their opinions and decisions about policy will be based on intuitive thinking, on the "representation of the world" that has been formed in their mind.

Which brings us (tomorrow) to the second complication.

1"Before you make that big decision...," Harvard Business Review, June, 2011.
2These ideas seem closely related to the idea of "framing".
3Who among readers of this blog have read the entire 4th assessment? I know I haven't.

1 TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/622

Complications - II from Uncommon Ground on June 9, 2011 6:00 AM

The first complication is that scientists - all of us really - have to accept that the decisions we make are not entirely determined by data and reason. They are, or should be, influenced by data and reason, but our... Read More

Leave a comment

 Subscribe in a reader

Pages

OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID

Technorati

Technorati search

» Blogs that link here

Nature Blog Network
Creative Commons License
This blog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Kent published on June 8, 2011 6:00 AM.

Hire some professionals was the previous entry in this blog.

Away for awhile is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.