
Image by Getty Images via @daylife
Basically, [the paper] doesn't present ANY convincing evidence that arsenic has been incorporated into DNA (or any other biological molecule)There was such an uproar that the paper, which was published online in Science Express, has yet to appear in print. Links to a lot of information about the paper and critiques of it appeared on Twitter with the hashtag #arseniclife.
On Friday, eight technical comments on the original Science Express article and a response to those comments were published -- again in Science Express. The final version of the Wolfe-Simon paper will appear, along with the technical comments, in the 3 June issue of Science. But as Carl Zimmer says in Slate,
For those of us who have been tracking #arseniclife since last Thanksgiving, however, today comes as an anticlimax. There's not much in the letters to Science that we haven't read before. In the past, scientists might have kept their thoughts to themselves, waiting for journals to decide when and how they could debate the merits of a study. But this time, they started talking right away, airing their criticisms on the Internet. In fact, the true significance of the aliens-that-weren't will be how it helped change the way scientists do science. (emphasis added)
If you're in or near New York City this week, I encourage you to visit the 




I use 





A couple of weeks ago the 

















