July 2010 Archives

Donald Molloy has been busy

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
If the name Donald Molloy doesn't ring a bell, let me remind you. He's the judge for the Federal District Court for Montana who let wolf hunts go forward in Idaho and Montana last September, and who a few weeks later ruled that Yellowstone grizzlies should be returned to the endangered species lists.

Molloy has been busy. On Tuesday, he ruled that the U.S. Forest Service violated the National Environmental Protection Act  when it determined that use of chemical fire retardants had only a minimal environmental impact.

Molloy ordered the Forest Service to comply with the federal laws by Dec. 31, 2011, threatening contempt sanctions if the agency fails to do so.

He also ruled that the critical habtiat designation for lynx wrongly excluded large amounts of habitat.

In particular, the court ruled that tens of thousands of acres in southwest Montana, north and central Idaho and throughout Colorado should have been considered for protection.

The U. Va subpoena and academic freedom

| No Comments | 1 TrackBack
Share |
In April Michael Cuccineli, the attorney general of Virginia, filed suit ordering the University of Virginia to hand over documents and other materials relating to Michael Mann's research when he was a faculty member there. The AAAS asked Cucinelli either to justify his actions or withdraw the suit, and the University opted to fight the request in court. Even a vigorous critic of Mann called Cuccinelli's suit a "witch hunt." Here's how Molly Corbett Broad, President of the American Council on Education, describes the situation:

A fundamental principle is at stake, often described in shorthand as academic freedom. More to the point, it's the understanding that government will not without extraordinarily compelling reasons intrude on the process of scientific discovery. It's a principle on which liberals and conservatives alike can agree.

The ill-advised investigation in Charlottesville transgresses a long-honored boundary, with implications that extend far beyond the Albemarle County courthouse where the university has filed a petition to block the subpoena. That is why I, along with other higher education leaders, scientists and scholars (including even some of Professor Mann's scientific detractors), support the university's legal battle.
Follow that link to read the whole thing. It's worth your time.

The value of a statistical life and public policy

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
Asbestos (tremolite) silky fibres on muscovite...

Asbestos with muscovite -- Image via Wikipedia

It is sometimes argued that poorer countries should welcome industries that are more environmentally degrading than would be welcome in richer countries.1 Edward Carr brings this up in the context of a recent report from PRI on the global asbestos trade.

Asbestos is vilified in the United States and banned in the European Union, but growing usage in the developing world has stoked fears of more asbestos-related deaths.

A proponent of continuing asbestos use in the developing world argues that other insulators are so much more expensive that the savings from using asbestos are greater than the cost to human lives and health.

What does this have to do with the value of a statistical life? What is the "value of a statistical life" anyway?

I'll answer the second question first. The value of a statistical life is a statistical construct based on how much people are willing to pay to avoid particular risks.2 As for the first question, when someone makes a claim like "the benefits from X (or savings from X) outweigh the costs associated with it", they're either making a bald assertion and hoping you won't ask how they made the calculation3 or they are reporting the results of a cost-benefit analysis, an analysis that depends on some estimate of how much a human life is "worth". That's where the value of a statistical life comes in.

To get back to asbestos then, if proponents of asbestos use a cost-benefit analysis to justify their assertion that use of asbestos is worth the cost in human health, they have to include some estimate of the value of a statistical life -- and there's the rub:

[T]he trouble [with] value of statistical life (VSL) calculations is they are based on willingness (and ability) to pay. Since environmental quality (and health and safety) is a normal good -- people want more if it when their incomes increase -- environmental quality (and health and safety) will be valued lower in places that have lower incomes. This naturally leads to lower VSL calculations and the policy implications are clear. The net benefits of many policies will be positive in rich countries and negative in less rich countries. But, this is not because lives are worth less in less rich countries but because less rich countries can't afford as much environmental quality (and health and safety) as rich countries. Sad, but true. (John Whitehead)

Three golden rules for scientific research

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
If you've done any computer programming, there's a good chance that you've heard of Edsger Dijkstra. In 1968, he published one of the most famous papers in computer science, "GOTO statement considered harmful."1 I was also reminded earlier today that he wrote short memos almost every day. The memos have been put on line at the University of Texas, where he was on the faculty until 2000. One of those memos has three golden rules for scientific research that we'd all do well to remember.

  • Raise your quality standards as high as you can live with, avoid wasting your time on routine problems, and always try to work as closely as possible at the boundary of your abilities. Do this, because it is the only way of discovering how that boundary should be moved forward.
  • We all like our work to be socially relevant and scientifically sound. If we can find a topic satisfying both desires, we are lucky; if the two targets are in conflict with each other, let the requirement of scientific soundness prevail.
  • Never tackle a problem of which you can be pretty sure that (now or in the near future) it will be tackled by others who are, in relation to that problem, at least as competent and well-equipped as you.
The first and the third of these rules are particularly sound advice. But at the risk of seeming presumptuous, I'd like to suggest a modification to the second.

  • We all like our work to be socially relevant and scientifically sound. Never sacrifice the requirement of scientific soundness for social relevance and interpret "social relevance" broadly (not just in terms of immediate utility), but always seek problems that are both socially relevant and scientifically sound.

What you need to know about energy

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
our-energy-system.png
The National Academy of Sciences hosts a website, What you need to know about energy, The graphic above is a screenshot captured from an interactive presentation on Our energy system. One striking fact pops out immediately.

Of the nearly 100 quadrilliion BTUs of energy used every year in the United States, more than half of it is wasted.

Were we simply to use our energy resources more efficiently, we'd go a long way toward reducing our dependence on foreign oil and reducing our inputs of CO2 into the atmosphere.

The What you need to know about energy site is filled with useful information on uses, sources, and costs of energy and on energy efficiency, including another interactive presentation on energy efficiency in cars (screenshot below). Head on over and take a look. You'll find it extremely useful.
nas-auto-efficiency-comparison.png

Infecting minds with science

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
Carl Zimmer's talk at the President's Forum at the annual meeting of the American Society of Microbiologists.

A congressional hearing on public access

| No Comments | 2 TrackBacks
Share |
Identical versions of the Federal Research Public Access Act (FRPAA) have been introduced in the House and the Senate. I shared a few concerns about FRPAA in a post last December. Here's what I had to say:

I am, however, concerned by the provision of the bill requiring free online public access within 6 months of publication. As Judy Jernstedt, editor of the American Journal of Botany, and I wrote to Senators Lieberman and Cornyn in September, if federally funded research is available free of charge from an easily accessible and permanent repository after only 6 months, personal and institutional subscriptions to journals publishing that research are likely to decline, and they may decline substantially. If they do, not-for-publishers, like the Botanical Society of America, will no longer be able to publish their journals and the results will be less public access to science, not more.

Like many not-for-profit publishers, the Botanical Society of America has already adopted policies that enhance public access to science. You can read the letter Judy and I sent on p. 146 of the December 2009 issue of the Plant Science Bulletin (please ignore the typo "imbedded" for "impeded").

I still have the same concerns. The House will be holding a public hearing on the act next Thursday (source). I suspect Judy Jernstedt and I may be sending a version of the letter we sent to Senators Lieberman and Cornyn to Rep. Mike Doyle, who introduced the bill in the House, and to Rep. Wm. Lacy Clay, Chairman, and Rep. Patrick McHenry, Ranking Member, of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Subcommittee on Information Policy, Census and National Archives, which is holding the hearing.

You know the budget stinks when

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
A university, Texas A&M in this case, decides that it's no longer going to put toilet paper in its dorms. Students will have to buy it themselves. From InsideHigherEd:

Texas A&M University, which is trying to cut $60 million campuswide, hopes to save $82,000 by ceasing to stock the bathroom essential in dormitories.

"We looked at what areas can we cut and not negatively affect our students' academics, and it was that," said Sherylon Carroll, associate vice president for communications.

The toilet paper elimination would begin in August 2011, giving the university enough time to inform the students and ensure that campus stores are stocking it. At that point, toilet paper will no longer be provided in residence hall bathrooms shared by up to four people; the university will continue to supply it in larger bathrooms, administrative office areas, and public areas.

June was very warm

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
june-2010-temperature-anomalies.gif
Just a couple of bullet points from the June State of the Climate report from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

  • The combined global land and ocean average surface temperature for June 2010 was the warmest on record at 16.2°C (61.1°F), which is 0.68°C (1.22°F) above the 20th century average of 15.5°C (59.9°F). The previous record for June was set in 2005.
  • June 2010 was the fourth consecutive warmest month on record (March, April, and May 2010 were also the warmest on record). This was the 304th consecutive month with a global temperature above the 20th century average. The last month with below-average temperature was February 1985.
Get that? The last month with below-average temperature was February 1985!

Related articles by Zemanta

Scienceblogs strike

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
Greg Laden has collected some reactions to the Scienceblogs strike at his other site.

See also these earlier posts. As I wrote yesterday,

I completely understand why so many Sciencebloggers are upset,1 but it's sad to see Scienceblogs falling apart. Will anyone replace them?

Where have all the Sciencebloggers gone?

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
There's a list over at The Intersection.

Greg Laden is now on strike.

Orac is "dithering over his future" (his words, not mine).

If you don't know what this is all about, read the links here.

Resonating naked

| 2 Comments | 1 TrackBack
Share |
Microsoft PowerPoint Icon

Image via Wikipedia

I've mentioned presentation zen before, but I haven't mentioned slide:ology. If you make PowerPoint presentations and you're not familiar with either or both of them, you owe it to yourself to borrow or buy a copy. Their filled with excellent advice.

I mention this because I learned recently that Garr Reynolds, author of presentation zen, and Nancy Duarte, author of slide:ology, have new books coming out this fall. I haven't seen either one of them yet, but if there anything close to as good as presentation zen and slide:ology, they will be exceptionally useful. Both focus on improving presentation, not just the visual aids.

naked-presenter.jpgGarr Reynolds new book is the naked presenter.  According to the blurb at Amazon.com

The Naked Presenter teaches readers how they can reach an audience by stripping away all that is unnecessary to get at the essence of the message. The naked presenter approaches the presentation task embracing the ideas of simplicity, clarity, honesty, integrity, and passion. She presents with a certain freshness. The ideas may or may not be radical, earth shattering, or new. But there is a "newness" and freshness to her approach and to her content. And if she uses slideware, her slides fit well with her talk and are harmonious with her message. The slides are in sync, and are simple and beautifully designed, yet never steal the show or rise above serving a strong but simple supportive role.
resonate.jpgNancy Duarte's book is resonate: Present Visual Stories that Transform Audiences. It's blurb at Amazon.com has this to say

Just as the author's first book helped presenters become visual communicators, Resonate helps you make a strong connection with your audience and lead them to purposeful action. The author's approach is simple: building a presentation today is a bit like writing a documentary. Using this approach, you'll convey your content with passion, persuasion, and impact.
I have no connection with either Reynolds or Duarte,1 except as an admirer of their work. I've ordered copies of both. If you make presentations, I encourage you to take a careful look at them when they come out -- at least watch for the reviews. Or if you're impulsive, like me, click those Amazon.com links and pre-order your copy now.

Scienceblogs -- falling apart?

| No Comments | 1 TrackBack
Share |
Seed Media Group sponsors Scienceblogs, a community of bloggers writing about many aspects of science. A little while ago they decided to allow Pepsi to write a blog. The denizens of Scienceblogs revolted. Fifteen of them left immediately. If you want to understand why, I can't do better than to point you to a linkfest that Bora put together and to the farewell message he posted yesterday.

Mike Dunford has also decided to leave, and P.Z. Myers is on strike.

I completely understand why so many Sciencebloggers are upset, but it's sad to see Scienceblogs falling apart. Will anyone replace them?

Climate stabilization targets

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
On Friday, the Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate of the National Academy of Sciences released a report: Climate stabilization targets: emissions, concentrations, and impacts over decades to millenia. Here's how the Report in Brief summarizes the conclusions:

Emissions of carbon dioxide from the burning of fossil fuels have ushered in a new epoch where human activities will largely determine the evolution of Earth's climate. Because carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is long lived, it can effectively lock the Earth and future generations into a range of impacts, some of which could become very severe. Therefore, emissions reductions choices made today matter in determining impacts experienced not just over the next few decades, but in the coming centuries and millennia. Policy choices can be informed by recent advances in climate science that quantify the relationships between increases in carbon dioxide and global warming, related climate changes, and resulting impacts, such as changes in streamflow, wildfires, crop productivity, extreme hot summers, and sea level rise.
The report includes the following table summarizing the relationship between CO2 levels in the atmosphere and the average amount of warming expected.

co2-warming-connection.pngOK. But what do those levels of warming mean? Well, the report provides some answers to that question, too. For each degree of warming there will be1

  • 5-10% less rainfall in Mediterranean, southwest North American, and African dry seasons.
  • 5-10% more rainfall in Alaska and other high latitude areas in the northern hemisphere.
  • 3-10% more heavy rainfall in most areas.
  • 5-10% less streamflows in some river basins, including the Arkansas and the Rio Grande.
  • 5-19% less corn production in the US, Africa, and India.
For more details, read the full report.

News release from NAS about the report.

Related articles by Zemanta

Steve Schneider 1945-2010

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
Anyone who's followed climate science at all for the last couple of decades will recognize the name Steve Schneider. Andy Revkin reports that Schneider died of a heart attack earlier today as a flight he was on landed in London.

Schneider will be missed by many for his energy, wit, ferocity, overloaded e-mail messages, guitar strumming and many other facets.

I don't do this

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
Or at least I hope I don't...

PhDcomics-incentives.png

Why fireflies flash

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
ResearchBlogging.orgOK. So you probably already know that fireflies flash to attract mates, but did you know that some of them flash synchronously?1

An entire forest can seem to flash at the same time.
In a very cool paper in last week's Science Andy Moiseff and Jon Copeland describe an experiment showing why being synchronized matters. They created a virtual environment filled with virtual males and manipulated the male flashing so that it was either synchronous or non-synchronous. When males flashed together, females responded together 82% of the time. When males didn't flash together, females responded between 3 and 10% of the time.

Synchronous flashing of many males appears to help females recognize males of their species even when there are many distractions.

Related articles by Zemanta

Just how bad is it?

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |

Pretty damn awful, if you ask me.

Number of tenured faculty declines

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
In the the "This is not good news category" we had news a few days ago about draconian cuts facing higher education in the UK. Now I learn, via an article by Robin Wilson in the Chronicle of Higher Education, that

Some time this fall, the U.S. Education Department will publish a report that documents the death of tenure.

Death of tenure you say? Well, it's not dead yet, but the trend is not encouraging.

Over just three decades, the proportion of college instructors who are tenured or on the tenure track plummeted: from 57 percent in 1975 to 31 percent in 2007. The new report is expected to show that that proportion fell even further in 2009. If you add graduate teaching assistants to the mix, those with some kind of tenure status represent a mere quarter of all instructors.
It's a trend driven largely by financial considerations. It's much cheaper to hire non-tenure track instructors than it is to hire tenure-track faculty. So what's the problem you ask? If it keeps college costs down, how can that be a bad thing (except for those of us who would like to keep our "lofty" salaries1). There are two problems:

  1. Non-tenure track instructors rarely have a long-term commitment from the institution that hired them. That's why they're non-tenure track. While all of the non-tenure track instructors I know care a lot about their students, they are often less interested in the long-term health and vitality of the institution where they're working than those of us fortunate enough to be tenured.2Can you blame them?
  2. Tenure allows faculty are free to pursue their research and creative work in whatever direction it leads them, even if that direction is inconvenient or uncomfortable for the institution that employs them, so long as it meets appropriate professional standards. Instructors who lack tenure are less likely to pursue those lines of work. Institutions that encourage such challenges and countries that value such institutions will be leaders not only in higher education, but also in science and the arts. They will be richer economically, culturally, and artistically.

The other vuvuzela

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
moraeavuvuzela1.jpgBy now vuvuzelas are famous (or infamous) thanks to the recently completed World Cup. I've heard reports that they were banned from several venues where fans were watching the World Cup. Some people find them annoying. I'm not a soccer (football to those of you outside the U.S.) fan, but even I know what a vuvuzela is.

So what does any of this have to do with the plant pictured at the left you ask?

A new species from the iris family found near Worcester, is to be named Moraea vuvuzela by SANBI botanist Dr John Manning to commemorate South Africa's hosting of the first Soccer World Cup on the African continent. (source)
The photo is of Morea vuvuzela. It is currently found in two renosterveld near Rawsonville and Villiersdorp in the Western Cape Province. Herbarium records from 1937 and 1940 from the nearby Franschoek Forest Reserve suggest that it was once more widespread. The Theewaterskloof and Brandvlei dams have inundated much of what would have been suitable habitat, and much of the habitat that hasn't been flooded has been converted to agricultural land.


The business of biodiversity

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
Last month, delegates to an international convention in Busan, South Korea approved a recommendation to the General Assembly of the United Nations to establish the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). As the Financial Times puts it (free registration required):

Climate change is no longer a concern just for environmentalists, but for business and governments. Biodiversity is following a similar trajectory.
Later today the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) will release a report from its initiative on The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB).1 According to the article in the Financial Times, the report will conclude that earth's ecosystems contribute services worth about $70 trillion per year. I expect to see that number challenged, and I wouldn't be surprised to find that there are substantial problems with it.2 Nonetheless, whether or not the $70 trillion per year figure is right, it's clear that biodiversity provides services of enormous value.

Businesses need to start thinking about ecosystems as an extension of their asset base, part of their plant and machinery, says Jon Williams, a partner at PwC. And ecosystem protection, or the impact of ecosystem loss, needs to be factored into investment appraisal and capital allocation decision-making.

"We are eating into the planet's capital rather than living off its interest," says Mr Williams.

And yet, according to PwC, only two of the world's largest 100 companies identified biodiversity and ecosystem loss as a strategic issue in a recent survey, while only a quarter of 1,100 global chief executives think biodiversity loss is a threat to their business growth.

In case you don't recognize PwC, that's PricewaterhouseCoopers, the international consulting firm. A press release from PwC on 22 May describing results of a corporate survey for TEEB was headlined "Biodiversity threat will eclipse climate change economic impacts but still miss CEO and valuations radar - PwC study".



Higher education in the UK facing draconian cuts

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
In the budget for the UK announced last month, the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills will suffer a 25% cut. If that cut is passed through to universities in the UK,1 an analysis by the University and College Union suggests that more than 22,000 jobs out of a little more than 262,000 could be lost. Nearly half of those positions may be university faculty. The impact on universities would be devastating.

UCU general secretary Sally Hunt said the scale of the cuts was "unprecedented" and would have an "undeniable impact on the student experience".

"Student to staff ratios, which are already high, will become some of the highest in the developed world," she said.

"Lecturers that survive the cull will have less time to give individual students as they pick up the workloads of former colleagues and there will be fewer support services for students.

"The government will effectively be asking students to pay more for less at a time when our international competitors are investing in higher education."

Related articles by Zemanta

More on UC and NPG

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
Not much new news, except that the dispute is beginning to catch the attention of business writers.
[T]he dispute underscores a more far-reaching debate in academia: Whether the old business model of scientific publishing, in which researchers turn their work over to commercial entities for free, then pay through the nose to access it in print or online, hasn't reached the point of ultimate absurdity.

...

The industry business model was developed, like most publishing, back in the days when you printed on paper or not at all. Typically, a researcher writes a report detailing the results of what may be millions of dollars of funded research, and submits it gratis to a commercial publisher.

The publisher has it reviewed by a panel of other researchers, also working for free, then prints it in bound form or posts it online behind a pay wall, so it can't be read except by customers who pay through the nose for the privilege. The UC system says it pays an average of $4,465 a year for each of the 67 Nature journals it subscribes to, a fee Nature proposes to raise to an average of $17,479.

Hiltzik correctly frames the dispute as part of "a more far-reaching debate". For decades publishers have enjoyed a monopoly position because the economics of printing made them essential. Online publication hasn't eliminated costs. The PLoS journals, for example, impose author fees to generate revenue rather than depending on subscriptions. But online publication challenges the stranglehold traditional print publishers have had on libraries and gives scholars and libraries new leverage against predatory pricing and gives them the opportunity to develop new, more collaborative models of publishing, like PLoS, BioOne, and Project Muse.1

For any plant DNA geeks out there

| 5 Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
ResearchBlogging.orgIf you work on plants and you've extracted DNA from them in the last 20 years, chances are that you've used some version of the method described by Doyle and Doyle.1 According to Google Scholar, Doyle and Doyle has been cited more than 4000 times. The method is reasonably straightforward, but tedious: disrupt membranes with CTAB2, add a mixture of chloroform and isoamyl alchohol, precipitate DNA from the aqueous phase using cold isoamyl alcohol, wash the precipitate with 70% ethanol, and re-dissolve.

In the most recent issue of the online-only Primer Notes and Protocols section of the American Journal of Botany there's a new paper by Dirk Bellstedt and colleagues describing a method for direct PCR amplification that may make life even simpler. You'll need to read the paper to get all of the details, but here's the basic procedure:

  1. Grind your plant material in a buffer.
  2. Centrifuge the mixture and mix the supernatant with a GES buffer.3
  3. Use the resulting mixture in PCR.
Sounds too simple to work, doesn't it? Well the authors tested the procedure by amplifying the trnL-F region of the chloroplast in more than 30 species of vascular plants, including Equisetum giganteum L., Cyathea dealbata (Forst.) Sw., Encephalartos longifolius (Jacq.) Lehm.,, Welwitschia mirabilis Hook.f., Sequoiadendron giganteum (Lindl.) Buchholz, Olea europaea L., and Potentilla ananassa (Rozier) Mabb. Of particular interest to me was their success with representatives of Protea and Pelargonium.

Cognitive surplus

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
There's an interesting idea here. I just wish I could figure out how to use it.



"The stupidest creative act is still a creative act."

It's not just grad students

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
holiday-cartoon.pngFaculty and post-docs feel the same way, although I behaved myself this year. Not only did I not go into the office on the 4th. I didn't even go in on the 5th.1

UC and NPG

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
University of California

Image via Wikipedia

I spent some time Googling yesterday for more news on the potential boycott of Nature Publishing Group journals by the University of California. I didn't learn anything new about the negotiations (or lack of negotiations). I did run across an interesting analysis of some legal issues by a Philadelphia lawyer, Maxwell S. Kennerly, Esq. He argues that NPG could sue UC for restraint of trade.

That possibility is almost too unfair to believe: the University of California likely has no legal recourse against the Nature monopoly, while the monopoly might have recourse if the free labor calls it quits. But that's the product of one hundred years of antitrust law evolution in the hands of pro-corporate courts. As Justice Holmes, who shaped many of these antitrust laws, said: "this is a court of law, not a court of justice."
But that's the way it is. If you want to understand why, you'll need to head on over to Kennerly's site and read the whole posting.

Click through for additional links.

Photos from South Africa

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
It's taken a long time, but I finally finished processing photos from my trip to South Africa in 2009. As some readers will know, my research in recent years has been on a group of plants in the genus Protea, and field work (all of which was done by a post-doctoral research associate and a graduate student who were working with me). Although I've visited three times to see the plants in the field, they really didn't need me. I'm more of a hindrance than a help in the field. Still, I really felt as if I needed to get there so that I'd have some of my own intuition about the plants. Click on the mosaic below to see photographs from my trip in May 2009 on Flickr.
south-africa-mosaic-2009.png

Do you think they'll send someone to Santa Barbara?

| 1 Comment | No TrackBacks
Share |
The Associated Press Building in New York City...

Image via Wikipedia

"This is a sprawling complex story. By creating both an editor with an overview and specific beats, we hope to help our journalists continue to focus on their elements of the story," [Mike] Oreskes said. "Designating an oil spill editor to take overall command of the story, and be free to focus exclusively on all the elements of the story, is one part of that commitment."

In addition to the three new hires, who will focus exclusively on the oil spill, the AP has about 20 full-time staffers in the Gulf who are involved in the coverage and another 50 or so reporters and editors who have been working on the story in the region, Oreskes said. ("Why the AP is Assigning Oil Spill Editor, Reporters", by Mallary Jean Tenore, Poynter Online)1
20 full-time staffers in the Gulf and 50 reporters and editors working on the story. They even have a page on their web site highlighting the work that they are doing.

But so far, Randy Olson still seems to be the only person to have compared this spill with the Santa Barbara spill 40 years ago -- and he's a filmmaker, not a reporter. Don't you think we might be able to learn something from those who lived through and covered the Santa Barbara spill? The Seattle Times did have a story comparing Deep Horizon to the Ixtoc 1 oil spill,2 but when I did a Google Search on "Santa Barbara oil spill", I didn't turn up reports from any major news outlets.

Michael Mann vindicated

| No Comments | 1 TrackBack
Share |
You may recall that last fall when ClimateGate exploded, Pennsylvania State University launched an investigation of Michael Mann's work. In February, a faculty review panel cleared him on three points of inquiry. Since then Ken Cuccinelli, attorney general of Virginia, filed a subpoena asking for documents relating to Mann's work on projects while a faculty member at the University of Virginia. AAAS called Cuccinelli's action "apparently political", and the University of Virginia took the unusual step of hiring its own counsel to oppose the subpoena. Even a harsh critic of Mann slammed Cuccinelli.

Why do I mention all of this? Because yesterday Penn State announced the final results of its inquiry.

Penn State Professor Mann has been cleared of any wrongdoing, according to a report of the investigation that was released today (July 1). Mann was under investigation for allegations of research impropriety that surfaced last year after thousands of stolen e-mails were published online. The e-mails were obtained from computer servers at the Climatic Research Unit of the University of East Anglia in England, one of the main repositories of information about climate change.
Many news outlets have picked up the story. Here are a few of the links I've found:

Congressional district visits

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
Picture 1.pngThe American Institute of Biological Sciences (AIBS) is sponsoring congressional district visits by biologists during the August congressional recess. The Botanical Society of America and several other scientific organizations are sponsors of the event.

This nationwide event enables scientists to meet with their members of Congress in their own district rather than in Washington, DC, and allows elected officials to learn first-hand about the science and research facilities in their district. This initiative is an opportunity to show elected officials how science is conducted and to showcase the people, equipment and facilities that are required to support and conduct scientific research.

For more information and to sign up (registratiion is open until 16 July) head over to http://www.aibs.org/public-policy/congressional_district_visits.html.

 Subscribe in a reader

Pages

OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID

Technorati

Technorati search

» Blogs that link here

Nature Blog Network
Creative Commons License
This blog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from July 2010 listed from newest to oldest.

June 2010 is the previous archive.

August 2010 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Trending content