A week and a half ago the Presidents of six public universities in New England signed a letter of support for the bill. In their letter to Senators Lieberman and Cornyn, the Presidents pointed out that
Dissemination of results is an essential component of the land-grant tradition of research and of our investment in science. We share your concern that far too often the results of research funded by the U.S. government are not broadly available to researchers, scientists, and members of the public. In addition to ensuring that this research is made available quickly, it is also critical that the published information remain broadly available for future use. We are pleased to see that your bill is designed to support both early, as well as long-term, access to scientific research results.I completely agree. I am, however, concerned by the provision of the bill requiring free online public access within 6 months of publication. As Judy Jernstedt, editor of the American Journal of Botany, and I wrote to Senators Lieberman and Cornyn in September, if federally funded research is available free of charge from an easily accessible and permanent repository after only 6 months, personal and institutional subscriptions to journals publishing that research are likely to decline, and they may decline substantially. If they do, not-for-publishers, like the Botanical Society of America, will no longer be able to publish their journals and the results will be less public access to science, not more.
Like many not-for-profit publishers, the Botanical Society of America has already adopted policies that enhance public access to science. You can read the letter Judy and I sent on p. 146 of the December 2009 issue of the Plant Science Bulletin.1
1Please ignore the horrible typo near the top of the second column -- "imbedded" where it should have been "impeded." We had it right in the letter, but somewhere a gremlin got into the system.



Leave a comment