What tuna are you eating?

| 4 Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
The latest  meeting of the international commission created to manage harvests of tunas and other wide-ranging fish species in the Atlantic Ocean ended by setting 2010 quotas for bluefin tuna that  conservation groups and  United States fisheries officials said were -- while lowered -- still far too high to allow the imperiled fish to recover. (from DotEarth)

The government of Monaco proposed a ban on international trade of bluefin tuna, and was  initially supported by the European Union and the U.S. It won't be hard for people who know the fish to recognize bluefin if whole fish are being shipped, but what if they've already been processed into steaks or filets? What then?

A little over a year ago a couple of high school students from Manhattan pointed the way. They used DNA fingerprinting to identify samples of sushi at New York restaurants and found that 25% were misidentified.

ResearchBlogging.orgJacob Lowenstein and his colleagues develop a more sophisticated DNA barcode based on cytochrome C oxidase subunit I to distinguish among all tuna species in the genus Thunnus (the genus to which bluefin belongs). They sampled tuna sushi from 31 restaurants in Manhattan and Denver. Among the 68 samples they tested they found some that were from endangered tuna species, some that weren't what they said, and some that were a health hazard.

Five out of nine samples sold as a variant of "white tuna" were not albacore (T. alalunga), but escolar (Lepidocybium flavorunneum), a gempylid species banned for sale in Italy and Japan due to health concerns. Nineteen samples were northern bluefin tuna (T. thynnus) or the critically endangered southern bluefin tuna (T. maccoyii), though nine restaurants that sold these species did not state these species on their menus.

The take home message? I see two. First, Lowenstein and colleagues demonstrate yet again that DNA barcoding can be a useful tool in identifying commercially sold fish (and other products). Second, think twice next time you order a piece of maguro at your favorite sushi bar and ask yourself how confident you are that it's not bluefin (and that the folks who run your sushi bar would know the difference or care).

Lowenstein, J., Amato, G., & Kolokotronis, S. (2009). The Real maccoyii: Identifying Tuna Sushi with DNA Barcodes - Contrasting Characteristic Attributes and Genetic Distances PLoS ONE, 4 (11) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007866

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/143

4 Comments

I think you have a mismatch between citation and article content! The DOI for the Lowenstein et al. article is doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007866

I believe the whole citation is pasted from a different posting. The tuna barcoding paper should be:

Lowenstein JH, Amato G, Kolokotronis SO. (2009) The Real maccoyii: Identifying Tuna Sushi with DNA Barcodes – Contrasting Characteristic Attributes and Genetic Distances. PLoS ONE 4(11):e7866. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0007866

Leave a comment

 Subscribe in a reader

Pages

OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID

Technorati

Technorati search

» Blogs that link here

Nature Blog Network
Creative Commons License
This blog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Kent published on November 20, 2009 6:00 AM.

Carbon offsets was the previous entry in this blog.

Exploring biodiversity: the search for new medicines is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.