An update on the Coburn amendment

| No Comments | 1 TrackBack
Share |
Last month I noted that Tom Coburn (R-OK) introduced a resolution that would have eliminated funding for political science research at the National Science Foundation. I was delighted to discover this morning that ScienceInsider reported last week that the Coburn amendment was soundly defeated: 36 to 62. I am disappointed that 36 senators voted for the amendment. It's important to note that five Democrats joined 31 Republicans in voting for the amendment.

[I]t wasn't strictly a party-line vote. Five moderate Democrats--Senators Max Baucus of Montana, Evan Bayh of Indiana, Claire McCaskill of Missouri, Ben Nelson of Nebraska, and Jim Webb of Virginia--apparently agree with Coburn's argument that NSF, with a budget of $6.9 billion, is "wasting" federal dollars by spending $9 million a year to support research in the field.

You can find how your Senator voted by clicking here.

1 TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/127

Image via WikipediaA couple of years ago, Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK) had a dumb idea. He proposed an amendment that would have eliminated social science funding at the National Science Foundation. The amendment was soundly defeated, but 36 senators vote... Read More

Leave a comment

 Subscribe in a reader

Pages

OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID

Technorati

Technorati search

» Blogs that link here

Nature Blog Network
Creative Commons License
This blog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Kent published on November 8, 2009 8:56 AM.

Science and advocacy was the previous entry in this blog.

Monday Pen is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.