September 2009 Archives

Be the voice of science

| 2 Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
I'm sorry, Randy. I can't be the voice of science. Maybe I can be one of the voices of science, but no one can be the voice of science. Science is too diverse, too complex, too wonderful, and too precious for any one person to be the voice of science.1 But Randy has a point.

If you share agree that science is undervalued in society; that too few people understand how scientists can contribute to solving problems like global climate change, biodiversity loss, and control of infectious diseases; that too few people understand the role scientists can play as neutral arbiters of what policy options are achievable;2 then you have a responsibility to do what you can to share the wonder and the beauty of science with as many people as you can. That's part of what I'm trying to do here.

The good news3 is that this is something I can do.As I mentioned a long time ago, I know myself well enough that the one thing I can do reasonably well in communicating is to be clear. I'm not very funny (at least not intentionally), and I don't have good stories to tell. What I can do is to share what I know in ways that are reasonably easy to understand so that those who want to learn are able. That's my "voice". And I've learned that no matter how much I wish I weren't a wallflower,no matter how much I wish I could tell a good story, I can't. That's not me. I can only be myself, even if that means I am a cerebral, literal minded, poor storyteller who thinks too much. At least that's my genuine voice, so that's what you'll hear.

Following Randy's advice, though. I will try to lighten up now and then, maybe even kick my shoes off and wiggle my toes in the sand or (horrors!) roll up my pant legs and wade out from shore. In short,I can't stop being a scientist. But maybe I can stop being such a scientist.

Don't be so unlikeable

| No Comments | 1 TrackBack
Share |
Wait a minute! Maybe all is not lost. I think too much, I'm too cerebral, I'm very literal minded, and I'm a lousy storyteller. In short, I'm a boring nerd, a wallflower, the guy you see at a party standing at the edge of a conversation wanting to be part of it but not knowing what to say. None of those traits will help me communicate science or explain to non-scientists the wonder and beauty I find in scientific research and discovery. But I think people who know me mostly like me.1

Randy's underlying message in this chapter is the power of positivity. As scientists we're conditioned to look for what's wrong.2 Was an experiment designed correctly? Were appropriate methods used to collect and analyze the data? Are the data being interpreted correctly? That's what we mean by "critical thinking" and "critical evaluation of theory and ideas". The whole process of peer review is built around this kind of critical evaluation, asking knowledgeable people to poke holes in what we've produced, recognizing that as a result of this collaborative effort, the results will be more reliable.

But "normal" people don't look for what's wrong, or at least "normal" people who are likeable don't look for what's wrong. I think everyone would agree that Oprah is a lot more likeable than Glenn Beck. And when was the last time you heard Oprah screaming about her disagreement with someone else? When was the last time you heard criticize a book rather than promoting it?

Being positive is something I'm fairly good at. My students are always telling me that I'm a "glass half full" kind of guy. That's great. It means that I may be (moderately) likeable, if also a little boring. Of course, that leads to a bit of a quandary.

How is it that we should confront those who want to teach creationism in science classes or who deny that humans are contributing to global climate change? We have to say that they're wrong, don't we? And aren't we being negative when we confront them?

Well, yes. But maybe there's a way to confront them without being too negative. I'll be back with more thoughts about that in a future post.

A haven for sharks

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
From Andy Revkin:

The Pacific island nation of  Palau has declared all of its waters a sanctuary for sharks. The archipelago, famed among biologists and divers for its rich marine life, has seen increases in illegal shark fishing, driven by the high prices paid for shark fins in China.

...

Given that, for the moment, Palau has only one enforcement vessel to patrol an ocean zone a bit smaller than Texas, the challenge of turning a ban from rhetoric to reality remains. But Palau is getting significant support from private groups, particularly the Pew Charitable Trusts, which worked with groups and government officials in Palau to create the sanctuary plan.
Granted, a single boat to patrol an area the size of Texas isn't much, but I am delighted to see a government step forward to declare protection of sharks as a goal. They probably won't stop the harvest, but at least they've made it illegal, and maybe they'll reduce it.

Don't be such a poor storyteller

| 3 Comments | 2 TrackBacks
Share |
OK. This is getting tough. First I find out that I think too much, then I find out I'm too cerebral, only to find out that I'm also too literal minded. None of that comes as much of a surprise. Those of you who know me know that I'm a moderately boring nerd.1 Now I find out I have to be a good storyteller to communicate effectively. That doesn't leave me much hope. I might have been able to figure out how to speak to the gut and to be a little more creative,2 but I've never been able to tell a good story. I don't have an eye for the details that make a story come I alive. I live in an abstract world of principles and ideas, not the real world of flesh and blood.

What makes it even worse is that although good stories have a predictable structure, one I might even be able to learn, they also have memorable characters.

Character is so much more powerful and deep and complex, but it is also very elusive, hard to teach, hard to analyze.
Damn! There isn't a formula. I'm going to have to rely on my intuition, which means my goose is cooked.

Being able to tell a concise, interesting, and entertaining story that also conveys substance is a trait that everybody likes.

You can see where this is going. I know what to shoot for, but I don't think it's a target I'll hit.

Jumping into science

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |

What do we want from Copenhagen?

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
John Quiggin has a reasonable answer:

The huge scientific uncertainty about the cost of inaction has obscured a surprisingly strong economic consensus about the economic cost of stabilising global CO2 concentrations at the levels currently being debated by national governments, that is, in the range 450-550 ppm. The typical estimate of costs is 2 per cent of global income, plus or minus 2 per cent. There are no credible estimates above 5 per cent, and I don't think any serious economist believes in a value below zero (that is, a claim that we could eliminate most CO2 emissions using only 'no regrets' policies).

For anyone who, like me, is confident that the expected costs of doing nothing about emissions, relative to stabilisation, are well above 5 per cent of global income that makes the basic choice an easy one. Any agreement that comes out of Copenhagen or its successors will be better than no agreement.

Follow the link to Crooked Timber to read the whole thing.

Monday Pen

| No Comments | 2 TrackBacks
Share |
cross-townsend.png
After buying my Pelikan 400, it didn't take me long to pick up another nice fountain pen -- a Cross Townsend. The pen pictured to the left is similar to mine, but as far as I can tell, the model I own is no longer available. It's more of a brick red mottled on a black background.Its trim is gold plated rather than rhodium or silver. I know I'm prejudiced, but I like the colors of mine better.

Its cap pulls off with a gentle pop and reseats with a similar snap. Ink flows smoothly from its medium nib -- when I use it. It's one of several pens stored in a display box at home that I pull out only occasionally. I pulled it out again as I was writing this entry, and I was reminded why I bought it in the first place. It has a nice "heft" and feel. I may exchange it for one of the other pens that I carry with me in my briefcase.1

It would be one of my "evening" pens. I use a pen with a fine nib for my morning journal entries and one with a broad nib in the evening.

Watching global warming

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
We don't have a problem of economics, technology, and public problem. We have a problem of perception. James Balog of Extreme Ice Survey
The problem of perception is that people don't see global warming. They think it's all pointy headed scientists and computer models, neither of which can really be trusted. Balog's TED presentation shows the effect of global warming on glaciers, not through measurements and graphs, but through time-lapse photography.

Watch the presentation.

Even if you already know that climate scientists have it right, even if you already know that spring is coming earlier, even if you already know that the earth is getting warmer, you'll be astonished at the scale of the impact we're having.

Green porno

| 2 Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
Speaking of lower organs, I just learned that Isabella Rosselini has a series of shorts for the Sundance Channel called Green Porno. The promo for season 3 features fried calamari (Sorry, you'll have to click through -- there doesn't seem to be a way to embed the video here).

Gonzo Scientist has more about the project at www.sciencemag.org, but here's a little background:

"Green Porno began as an experiment," says Rossellini. Fellow film icon Robert Redford challenged her to create a series of online shorts for the Sundance Channel. The constraints: "It had to work on a small screen, it had to be brief, and it had to be cheap," she says, because she was given a tiny budget. "It also had to be about the natural environment in some way." Her solution: Green Porno, a series of cartoonlike vignettes about the sex life of animals. "I want to give people a sense of wonder about the natural world," she says, "to make them fall in love with it and want to protect it." The first season's episodes were all about backyard invertebrates. For the second season, she teamed up with conservation biologist Claudio Campagna and focused on marine creatures.
"I want to give people a sense of wonder about the natural world, to make them fall in love with it and want to protect it."

I'm too much of a nerd to know how to create that sense of wonder, whether about the natural world or about science, but I'm delighted that there are people who can.

Don't be so literal minded

| 2 Comments | 4 TrackBacks
Share |
Yesterday I was too cerebral. Today I'm too literal minded. I'm fairly good at laying out facts and figures in a logical sequence. I realized long ago that I'd never be one of those professors who engages students with humorous anecdotes and memorable stories. I'm not funny, and I don't have any stories. I manage to be reasonably well liked1 by my students, but no one's going to confuse me with Jon Stewart or Stephen Colbert. Any success I've had as a teacher comes from being organized, not from any showmanship.2

In chapter 2, Randy Olson gives us another insight into effective communication, courtesy of Tom Hollihan, a communications professor at USC:

When it comes to mass communication, it's as simple as two things: arouse and fulfill. You need first to arouse your audience and get them interested in what you have to say; then you need to fulfill their expectations.
Students are a captive audience. They are in the room because they have to be there.3 So as a professor I have the most difficult part taken care of for me. My audience already cares (at least a little).

But to capture a broad audience (or to keep a reporter from falling a sleep), I need to learn how to arouse their interest, and to do that I'll have to speak to one of the three organs I'm least comfortable with, and the lower down in the body I can find a way to go, the more likely I am to be successful.

Damn! There are reasons not many people read this blog, Too cerebral, too literal minded. But I can't help myself. I am a nerd.

The Age of Stupid

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |


I haven't seen the movie yet, so I can't comment on how good it is, except to say that the topic is obviously timely. The video above is from a Grist interview with the Age of Stupid's director, Franny Armstrong. Here's the blurb from the Age of Stupid's website:

The Age of Stupid is the new four-year epic from McLibel director Franny Armstrong. Oscar-nominated Pete Postlethwaite stars as a man living alone in the devastated world of 2055, looking at old footage from 2008 and asking: why didn't we stop climate change when we had the chance? MORE

Save a journalist

| No Comments | 1 TrackBack
Share |
20090709_085932_10750.jpg
I've written before about the death of newspapers, now I learn that Congress is holding hearings about the future of newspapers. Here's a little bit of the story from yesterday's Editor & Publisher:

Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney (D-N.Y.), Chair of the House Joint Economic Committee (JEC), will convene a hearing "to examine contraction in the newspaper industry, the economic impact of the changing media landscape, as well as the future of the industry at large," according to an announcement. The hearing, titled "The Future of Newspapers: The Impact on the Economy and Democracy," will take place Thursday, at 10:00 am in the Cannon House Office Building.
There's a little more information available at the JEC web site.

Don't be so cerebral

| No Comments | 6 TrackBacks
Share |
Yesterday I pointed out that I think too much to communicate effectively. In the first chapter of Don't be Such a Scientist, Randy Olson explains why thinking too much is a problem. It comes down to his four organs approach to communication: head, heart, gut, and sex organs. The farther down the human body you go, Randy claims, the broader the audience you're likely to reach.

The scientist in me is screaming "Where's the data?" Randy presents anecdotes instead. They're funny and interesting. He's doing what he learned to do in film school. He's showing us how to communicate at least as much as he's telling us.

Data, logic, and reasoning are cerebral. They're what scientists and academics live for. Communicating science (or anything else for that matter) requires that we grab our audiences attention. If our audience is academics, data, logic, and reasoning will be central to grabbing their attention. If we're speaking with editors or reporters, data, logic, and reasoning will still be important, but they'll be looking for a good story, a "hook" that will grab a broader audience. That's going to involve the heart at least, and maybe the gut and something even lower.

As Randy puts it, "[T]he brain is the epicenter for all that's permanent and lasting when it comes to information, [but] ... the lower organis ... offer ... extra vitality, sparks of energy."

So when you're trying to communicate with non-academics, don't forget to speak to the hearts and guts of your audience as well as their minds.1

Spider silk

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
From the New York Times

As Nicholas Godley, a fashion designer living in Madagascar put it, "If we were doing all of this to make money, I could think of much, much easier ways to do it." The fabric illustrated above is 11 feet long, and it's made from the silk of golden orb spiders from Madagascar. Collecting the silk to weave the fabric was an enormous challenge. Godley and Simon Peers, a British art historian who also lives in Madagascar, hired local people to collect spiders (about 3000 a day) and set up a system where workers drew the silk from the spinnerets.

And what became of the spiders, without whose very personal contributions the textile would not have been possible? While some died in its production, Mr. Godley and Mr. Peers said they set up a system in which the spiders being used were released daily, and detailed spreadsheets were kept to chart the number of spiders used, their yield and the casualty rate.

"We have become sort of the defenders of these spiders, something we never thought we'd be," said Mr. Godley, who calls himself a committed arachnophobe, but added, "They really are very regal-looking creatures." (source)
Peers and Godley estimate that the piece of cloth pictured above cost about half a million dollars to produce. Clearly, it's not likely that making cloth from these spiders will build a big industry in Madagascar, but it is a reminder of the incredible beauty to be found in nature -- and the incredible strength. Its tensile strength is five to six times greater than that of steel by weight.

You think too much

| No Comments | 5 TrackBacks
Share |
Those are the first four words in Randy Olson's new book, Don't be Such a Scientist.1 I won't quote the next four words. If you want to know what they are, you'll just have to buy the book. Suffice it to say that these four words and the next few are a quote from Randy's acting teacher.

[T]hat's where this book begins -- with the realization that as an academic I had been trained to think rather than act.2

That's me. I think about problems. I collect data and analyze them. I get impatient when people3 tell stories that aren't accurate because "they make a better story". I'm a stickler for accuracy.

Unfortunately, so far as communicating with non-academics,4 that makes me pretty ineffective for a lot of reasons that Randy explains in later chapters of this book. But if you want to know what those reasons are and what I'll need to do to become more effective, you'll either have to return for later posts in this series, click through to my earlier post on the book, or click over to http://www.dontbesuchascientist.com/ and follow the review links there.

Yellowstone grizzlies are threatened

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
Judge Donald W. Molloy of the Federal District Court for Montana has been busy. A couple of weeks ago he denied a request that Defenders of Wildlife and other environmental groups made to stop the wolf hunt in Idaho. Today I read that Yellowstone grizzlies are being returned to the endangered species list.

Facing the combined pressures of habitat loss, hunters and climate change, 600 grizzly bears in and around Yellowstone National Park are going back on the threatened species list under a federal court order issued Monday.

The ruling highlighted climate change's devastation to whitebark pine forests, which produce nuts that some grizzlies rely upon as a mainstay.

With hundreds of thousands of the trees dead or dying over the last two decades, bears striking out in search of new food sources increasingly are being shot in conflicts with humans.

"There is a connection between whitebark pine and grizzly survival," U.S. District Judge Donald Molloy wrote in Monday's ruling. (emphasis added; Associated Press)

Jobs from acting on global climate

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
Cap and trade probably isn't free, although the benefits may be twice as great as the costs. Now there's more evidence that acting to halt climate change may benefit the economy.

Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair says he hopes to break the "deadlock" in global climate talks with evidence that 10 million jobs could be created by 2020, if developing nations agree to big cuts in greenhouse gases.

Blair, heading up a climate initiative, released a report that also shows a global climate agreement could increase the world's GDP by 0.8 percent by 2020, as compared with the projected gross domestic product with no climate action. (from the Associated Press)

I haven't been able to find a copy of the report, but I'm sure some economists will note that while creating 10 million jobs is a wonderful thing, it's not clear from the press report whether that's 10 million new jobs after absorbing job losses from carbon-intensive industries. If not, the net benefits could be substantially smaller than promised.

Don't get me wrong. Climate action is clearly worth the cost. I'm just a little skeptical that it's free. There is no such thing as a free lunch.

Monday Pen

| 3 Comments | 7 TrackBacks
Share |
When I pointed out last week that I like fountain pens, Karina (of Aspiring Ecologist) suggested I try a weekly pen post, rather like the shoe of the week posts Dr. Isis makes. I don't know whether I'll be scouring pen catalogs (mostly Fahrney's) for pens to feature, but I did decide to start a series of posts about the fountain pens I own. I know that a few of you knew that I liked fountain pens before reading last week's post, but I doubt that any of you are prepared for how many posts are coming.

I was going to start with a post about a very nice sterling silver pen from Levenger that was a gift from one of my graduate students a number of years ago, but I couldn't find an image of it on the Levenger site. Apparently, it's no longer available. It was one of the first nice fountain pens I owned. I'll take a photograph of it and post it some time later in this series.

I could have started wiht a post about the cheap cartridge fountain pen that I used as a post-doc,1 but that didn't seem right. So I'm starting with a post about my first serious fountain pen, a Pelikan 400 that I've had since 1995 or 1996.

pelikan-400.png
It's a wonderful pen, a piston fill with a broad beautiful line.2 I've used it more than any other fountain pen I own. Although it's sometimes been filled with blue ink, mostly it's filled with black. It's one of my regular evening journal pens, and whenever I want to spend time with an old friend, he's the one I turn to.

Bird tango

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |


Birds are noteworthy not only for their wit, charm, and sartorial splendor but also for their great dancing. So, for its contribution to this year's Darwin celebrations, London's Rambert Dance Company is putting on a bird-inspired show.(from Origins)

And now for something completely different

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
jackinpulpitnew.jpg
My copy of Randy Olson's new book, Don't be Such a Scientist, arrived earlier this week. I'll be posting more comments about it later. For now, I want to use the photograph to the left -- of a jack-in-the-pulpit urinal by Clark Sorenson, available for a mere $7900 -- to mention one lesson I've learned so far.

In chapter 1, Randy advises us,1 "Don't be so cerebral." In chapter 2, he advises us, "Don't be so literal minded." Chapter 1 introduces his "Four organs theory" of connecting with a mass audience, and chapter 2 admonishes us to "arouse your audience and fulfill their expectations." You'll have to buy (or borrow) the book if you want to know more,2 but when I saw this sculpture, I realized that it unifies these two chapters (or at least chapter 1 and the "arouse their interest" part of chapter 2).

Whether or not Sorenson consciously thought about it, his sculpture is obviously talking to our gut (or maybe our sex organs), not to our heart. That's almost guaranteed to get Sorenson a larger audience than if he were talking to our head (Marcel Duchamp notwithstanding). He's used an appeal to the gut (or somewhere lower in our anatomy) to capture our attention, and once he's got it, you start wondering about the structure he illustrates. In this case and in the other sculptures displayed on his urinal page, Sorenson does a pretty good job of making accurate 3-dimensional models various flowers and snail shells. Most guys will probably go no further than to snicker at the flower while they're using it, but no one who uses it is likely to forget it, and that alone makes botany seem a little more interesting than it would have otherwise.

Cap and trade isn't free

| No Comments | 1 TrackBack
Share |
But it isn't terribly expensive either. According to the Congressional Budget Office:

CBO concludes that the cap-and-trade provisions of H.R. 2454, the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009, would reduce GDP below what it would otherwise have been--by roughly ¼ to ¾ percent in 2020 and by between 1 and 3½ percent in 2050. By way of comparison, CBO projects that real (that is, inflation-adjusted) GDP will be roughly two and a half times as large in 2050 as it is today, so those changes would be comparatively modest. In the models that CBO reviewed, the long-run cost to households would be smaller than the changes in GDP because consumption falls by less than GDP and because households benefit from more time spent in nonmarket activities. Moreover, these measures of potential costs do not include any benefits of averting climate change.
If you want to read the whole report, there is a PDF available.

A new biology

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
WASHINGTON -- A report released today by the National Research Council calls on the United States to launch a new multiagency, multiyear, and multidisciplinary initiative to capitalize on the extraordinary advances recently made in biology and to accelerate new breakthroughs that could solve some of society's most pressing problems -- particularly in the areas of food, environment, energy, and health. (press release)
If you'd like to read the whole report, A New Biology for the 21st Century, it's available from the National Academies Press. Here's just a little bit from the Preface to the report.

[T]he essence of the New Biology is integration--re-integration of the many subdisciplines of biology, and the integration into biology of physicists, chemists, computer scientists, engineers, and mathematicians to create a research community with the capacity to tackle a broad range of scientific and societal problems. The committee chose biological approaches to solving problems in the areas of food, environment, energy and health as the most inspiring goals to drive the development of the New Biology. But these are not the only problems that we both hope and expect a thriving New Biology to be able to address; fundamental questions in all areas of biology, from understanding the brain to carbon cycling in the ocean, will all be more tractable as the New Biology grows into a flourishing reality. Given the fundamental unity of biology, it is our hope and our expectation that the New Biology will contribute to advances across the life sciences.

On hunting wolves

| 1 Comment | 1 TrackBack
Share |
Hunters started hunting wolves in some parts of Idaho a couple of weeks ago, and so far hunters aren't finding it easy. From the New York Times a few days ago:

Hunting and killing are not the same thing. Even as Idaho has sold more than 14,000 wolf-hunting permits, the first 10 days of the first legal wolf hunt here in decades have yielded only three reported legal kills. (Click here for a video from the Times.)

On 10 September, "[Judge] Donald W. Molloy of the Federal District Court for Montana, denied a request by environmentalists and animal welfare groups that he stop the hunts, in Montana and Idaho" (AP). Earlier this week I ran across this editorial:

The gray wolf is a top predator, an essential part of the ecosystem, a symbol of the West. And it's a symbol best displayed, not as pelts on a wall, but by packs in the wild.

Exterminated like vermin, a bounty on their heads, the gray wolf was hunted to extinction in the West. Reintroduced in central Idaho and Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming in 1995, the endangered species staged a remarkable, yet still incomplete, recovery. Now, due to the shortsighted decision by the Bush and Obama administrations to remove the wolf from the endangered species list in Idaho and Montana, that recovery is threatened.

...

There's no need for wolf slaughters disguised as "management plans." Wolves will manage quite well if just left alone. Hopefully, the judge will come to that conclusion.

You're probably thinking that editorial appeared in a Sierra Club publication or something like that. Well you'd be wrong. Click through to find out where it appeared.



Norman Borlaug and the green revolution

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
From Sunday's New York Times:

Norman E. Borlaug, the plant scientist who did more than anyone else in the 20th century to teach the world to feed itself and whose work was credited with saving hundreds of millions of lives, died Saturday night. He was 95 and lived in Dallas.

...

Dr. Borlaug's advances in plant breeding led to spectacular success in increasing food production in Latin America and Asia and brought him international acclaim. In 1970, he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.
Tom Philpott (at Grist) has a different view.

Rather than focusing on the social relations around agriculture, Borlaug honed in on one thing: increasing yield. For him, the complexities of poverty and hunger could be reduced to a single problem: not enough food. From there, the answer was simple: grow as much as possible, using whatever technology available.

...

But it may be that Borlaug's blindness to politics--his refusal to consider the power relations at work in the countries whose hungry he set out to save--undermined his legacy. His tireless effort to boost grain yields, while no doubt resulting in a flood of cheap grain, created all manner of problems that won't be easily solved.

...

The award for buying into the "Green Revolution package" was a bumper crop. The problem was that when everyone did the same thing and yields spiked, the price farmers received for their crops plunged.

The result is a kind of vicious cycle: farmers scramble to produce more to offset losses, leading to yet more downward pressure on prices. Of course, there's the temptation to boost yields with yet more inputs like fertilizer--meaning that farmers' costs could continue creeping up even as the prices they received in the marketplace fell steadily. The result is a kind of structural economic crisis in farming.

The winners in the game are not farmers, but rather the buyers of the cheap commodities (mainly transnational grain processors like Archer Daniels Midland and Cargill) as well as input suppliers (like Monsanto, Dupont, and, again, Cargill) that sell the needed seeds and agrichemicals.

A new way to read the news

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
Leave it to Google to come up with yet another new way to read news over the Internet. Click on the image below to see Google Fast Flip in action.

google-fast-flip.png

I like fountain pens

| 2 Comments | 3 TrackBacks
Share |
delta-evolution.png
Those of you who know me know that I have a weakness for fountain pens. The Delta Evolution (pictured above) is not only an attractive pen (available from Fahrney's for a mere $636), it was designed to celebrate Darwin's bicentennial. Quoting from the blurb on Fahrney's web site:

Delta's Evolution celebrates the 200th anniversary of the birth of Charles Darwin (1809-1882) and his remarkable theory of natural selection. The limited edition pens are hand-turned from solid blocks of marbled blue resin with antiqued, solid sterling silver accents. The central ring depicts the famous sketch "Darwin's Finches" in high relief. The fountain pen has an 18K white gold nib engraved with a snail shell. Each mode is limited to 809 pieces. Cartridge/converter fill.
Tempting. But too rich for my blood. The Conway Stewart Limited Edition Darwin fountain pen (pictured below) is even more tempting, but at $2328, I'm afraid I'll have to give it a pass too.
conway-stewart-darwin.png

Speaking of communicating

| 1 Comment | 1 TrackBack
Share |
This isn't about communicating science per se, but the advice is certainly relevant. Carmine Gallo has put together a short essay describing how to give a really, really, really bad presentation.1 As he says,

Giving truly great presentations requires skill, work, and practice. Giving catastrophic presentations is far easier. So if you want to take the easy way out and look like a rank amateur, here are 15 surefire tips to guarantee that you leave a really, really bad impression.

Hooking people on conservation

| 1 Comment | 1 TrackBack
Share |
I just read about a new restaurant1 I'll have to try the next time I'm in Washington, DC. Here's how Hook describes itself on its website:

Hook Restaurant is committed to providing an exceptional dining experience, but also to educating the community about our mission. The menu changes daily to reflect whatever sustainable fish are in season and available. We also use locally grown produce, and humane meat and dairy products. The essential characteristic of sustainability is flexibility, so as we learn more we change our behavior. Our eco-friendly practices are merely a reflection of a deeper ideology: the two things than link every human on the planet are food and environment and we cannot live with out either.

Hook works with the Blue Ocean Insitute, the Seafood Choices Alliance, and the Monterey Bay Aquarium to ensure that the fish it serves are harvested sustainably. And to the extent possible, the fish is also obtained from local sources. Here are a few paragraphs from Kate Frazer describing a recent meal:

Lucky for me, my search for the full picture starts with a plate lined with oysters: a small, crisp California Kumamoto; a soft, briny New York Blue Point; and a sweet, deep-cupped Rappahannock from here in Virginia.

Perhaps more than any other food, oysters reflect their habitats. Each one has a flavor defined by geography, ocean currents and the water's characteristics.

They're all delicious, but the Rappahannock is my favorite -- buttery with a clean finish tasting of the sea. These oysters are grown in one of the region's most pristine tidal freshwater systems, downstream from where [The Nature] Conservancy has worked with local, state and federal partners to protect thousands of acres.

Hook's Manos de Leon dishThe next dish, Manos de Leon, features unspeakably tender scallops from Baja named "lion's paw" for their size and golden color. Chef serves them with coconut foam, blood oranges and subtle citrus oil that let the sweetness of the tiny pillows shine. They're hand-picked from turquoise lagoons by divers who leave the undersea flora intact, and I imagine them propelling through strands of eelgrass, waving their shells like butterfly wings.

Charles Darwin: The Man Behind the Idea

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
yos09-405x130.gif
If you happen to live near Storrs, here's an event you may want to attend this evening.

Friday Sept. 18, 2009
7-9 p.m.
Starbucks, Storrs

The human side of Charles Darwin is often lost in discussions of his work. What happened during the 23 years between his voyage on the Beagle and the publication of his seminal book? What was behind his struggles with his new idea? How can his humanity be conveyed through the arts? Join us for an evening of presentations, discussions and exploration. We'll have an introduction from Dr. Salman Hameed from Hampshire College followed by a reading from Timberlake Wertenbaker's "After Darwin" performed by students from the UConn Department of Dramatic Arts. Free coffee will also be available.

For more information, see the Year of Science webpage at http://clas.uconn.edu/yearofscience/index.html or email Mark Peczuh at mark.peczuh@uconn.edu with questions.

This event is sponsored by the UConn Year of Science.

Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
From my e-mail inbox this morning:

Dear Colleagues,

The multistakeholder on-line consultation on IPBES co-hosted by IUCN, ICSU and DIVERSITAS will close this Sunday 13 September. Many thanks to the 120 individuals who have completed the questionnaire. We hope to receive even more input!
Background information can be found on the official IPBES site now open, and also here.

DIVERSITAS, the international programme of biodiversity science, is working together with its parent organisation, ICSU, the International Council for Science, and IUCN, the International Union for Conservation of Nature, to collect the views of the scientific community and other important stakeholders on a proposal for a new Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). IPBES is a mechanism proposed to strengthen the science-policy interface on biodiversity and ecosystem services, with broad similarities to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

IPBES has gathered considerable political support and the current timetable is that a decision on its establishment will take place by late 2010.

You are kindly invited to submit your views on IPBES by completing an online questionnaire, which can be found at IPBES consultation.

In addition, I would ask you to help circulate this link to any potentially interested scientists and institutions that you are aware of. The deadline for submissions is 13 September.

All submissions will be jointly analysed by ICSU, DIVERSITAS and IUCN at a meeting on 22 September, in order to provide input to a key intergovernmental meeting convened by UNEP (5-9 October 2009, Nairobi, Kenya), which will discuss plans for IPBES, and its establishment.

This is an important opportunity for all of us to influence the future mechanisms that will structure the science and policy interface for biodiversity and ecosystem services.

Thanking you in advance for your contribution,

Yours sincerely,

Anne Larigauderie

 

Dr. Anne Larigauderie
Executive Director
DIVERSITAS
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle (MNHN)
57, Rue Cuvier- CP 41 75231 Paris Cedex 05
France
Tel: 33 1 40 79 80 41 (direct)
Tel: 33 1 40 79 80 40 (secretariat)
e-mail: anne@diversitas-international.org
www.diversitas-international.org
 

Promoting science literacy

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Share |
yos09-405x130.gif
If you're one of the small number of people who read this blog regularly, you'll know that I've been harping on about communicating science for awhile. Well, I'm harping again, but this time I'm mostly pointing you in the direction of a new resource.

At the annual meetings of the Botanical Society of America in 2008, Past-President Chris Haufler organized a symposium on the crisis in scientific literacy. Papers based on those presentations are being published in the October issue of the American Journal of Botany (press release from the AJB office).

Here are links to advance copies of the papers:
  • Christopher H. Haufler and Marshall Sundberg Symposium on scientific literacy: Introduction doi:10.3732/ajb.090024
  • Gordon E. Uno
    doi:10.3732/ajb.0900025
  • Judy Scotchmoor, Anastasia Thanukos, and Sheri Potter doi:10.3732/ajb.0900014
  • Matthew C. Nisbet and Dietram A. Scheufele doi:10.3732/ajb.0900041

Lab news again

| No Comments | 1 TrackBack
Share |
kathryn-with-aeranthes.jpg
Last month I mentioned that one of my students, Kathryn Theiss, had been awarded a fellowship from the Switzer Foundation. (That's Kathryn next to one of her orchids in Madagascar there at the left.)  Today I discovered that the University has released yet another story about her. It appears in UConn Today, the online version of our campus news.

Here are a couple of paragraphs from the article:

The Switzer award, a prestigious national fellowship, will enable her to return to Madagascar and continue her field studies.

The awards are given to young environmental leaders at universities in New England or California. They include a $15,000 award, which Theiss will use to continue her research on native orchids in Madagascar.

Cap and trade: Good for the economy?

| No Comments | 1 TrackBack
Share |
Could it really be that Waxman-Markey would be good for the economy? It's already clear that cap and trade, a carbon tax, or something is necessary to wean us from overreliance on carbon-intensive energy sources. Now this:

As flawed as it may be, the Waxman-Markey climate bill makes economic sense, offering benefits worth at least twice as much as it costs, if not more.

"From almost any perspective and under almost any assumption, H.R. 2454 is a good investment for the United States to make in our own economic future and in the future of the planet," the paper concludes.
The paper referred to is from New York University's Institute for Policy Integrity: The Other Side of the Coin: The Economic Benefits of Climate Legislation.

I know what you're thinking. "That's NYU. A bunch of pointy-headed liberals in a liberal east coast city." Well, that might be true,1 but the news article I'm quoting from didn't appear in the Village Voice, or even the New York Times. No, it's from that bastion of liberal opinion known as the Wall Street Journal, running under the headline "Waxman-Markey: Benefits Far Outweigh Costs, New Study Finds".

Digital books are green

| 4 Comments | 1 TrackBack
Share |
amazon_kindle_on_page.jpg
I am very fond of my Kindle (pictured left).1 Others swear by Sony's Reader. I'm not going to argue about which is the better reader, I just want to point out that another study has been released suggesting that eBook readers are a green alternative to paper books and magazines that you should consider.2

In 2008, the U.S. book and newspaper industries combined resulted in the harvesting of 125 million trees, not to mention wastewater that was produced or its massive carbon footprint.

The report indicates that, on average, the carbon emitted in the lifecycle of a Kindle is fully offset after the first year of use.

The report, authored by Emma Ritch, states: "Any additional years of use result in net carbon savings, equivalent to an average of 168 kg of CO2 per year (the emissions produced in the manufacture and distribution of 22.5 books)." (source)

I carry copies of about a dozen books on my Kindle, but I suspect my biggest carbon savings will come from the magazines for which I no longer need paper, the Atlantic Monthly, the New Yorker, and the Economist. I've also picked up subscriptions to a couple of magazines that I bought occasionally on newsstands, so I'm saving less paper there, but I'm better informed: Technology Review, the Times Literary Supplement.

As Adam Stein points out, used bookstores and libraries are greener than eBook readers for books, but I suspect that eBook readers will be hard to beat for magazines,

 Subscribe in a reader

Pages

OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID

Technorati

Technorati search

» Blogs that link here

Nature Blog Network
Creative Commons License
This blog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from September 2009 listed from newest to oldest.

August 2009 is the previous archive.

October 2009 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Trending content