Next: Wright's -statistics
Up: Wahlund effect, Wright's F-statistics
Previous: A numerical example
You should know by now that I'm not going to be satisfied with a
numerical example. I now feel the need to do some algebra to describe
this situation a little more generally.
Suppose we know allele frequencies in
subpopulations. Let
be
the frequency of
in the
th subpopulation. Then if we assume
that all subpopulations contribute equally to combined
population,2 we can
calculate expected and observed genotype frequencies the way we did
above:
where
and
. Now
Similarly,
Since
by definition, with equality holding only
when all subpopulations have the same allele frequency, we can
conclude that
- Homozygotes will be more frequent and heterozygotes will be less
frequent than expected based on the allele frequency in the
combined population.
- The magnitude of the departure from expectations is directly
related to the magnitude of the variance in allele frequencies across
populations,
.
- The effect will apply to any mixing of samples in which
the subpopulations combined have different allele
frequencies.3
- The same general phenomenon will occur if there are multiple
alleles at a locus, although it is possible for one or a few
heterozygotes to be more frequent than expected if there is
positive covariance in the constituent allele frequencies across
populations.4
- The effect is analogous to inbreeding. Homozygotes are more
frequent and heterozygotes are less frequent than
expected.5
To return to our earlier numerical example:
| |
Expected |
|
|
|
Observed |
 |
0.3025 |
+ |
0.0225 |
= |
0.3250 |
 |
0.4950 |
- |
2(0.0225) |
= |
0.4500 |
 |
0.2025 |
+ |
0.0225 |
= |
0.2250 |
Next: Wright's -statistics
Up: Wahlund effect, Wright's F-statistics
Previous: A numerical example
Kent Holsinger
2008-09-06