The analysis involves 719 offspring from 74 sires and 192 dams, each with one litter. The offspring were spread over 4 generations, and the analysis is performed as a nested ANOVA with the genetic analysis nested within generations. An additional complication is that the design was unbalanced, i.e., unequal numbers of progeny were measured in each sibship. As a result the degrees of freedom don't work out to be quite as simple as what I showed you.8 The results are summarized in Table 6.
Using the expressions for the composition of the mean square we obtain


Why didn't I give a definite number for
after my big spiel above
about how we can estimate it from a full-sib crossing design? Two
reasons. First, if you plug these values into the formula above for
you get
, which is clearly impossible
since
has to be less than
and
has to be greater than
zero, since it's a variance. Second, the experimental design actually
confounds two sources of resemblance among full siblings: (1) genetic
covariance and (2) environmental covariance. Since the full-sib
families were all raised by the same mother in the same pen, we don't
know to what extent their resemblance is due to a common natal
environment.9 If we assume
, we can
estimate the amount of variance accounted for by exposure to a common
natal environment,
, and by environmental variation
within sibships,
.10
Similarly, if we assume
, then
and
. In any case, we can estimate the narrow sense heritability as
