Next: Bibliography
Up: Partitioning the phenotypic variance
Previous: An alternative expression for
We've been through a lot of algebra by now. Let's run through a couple
of numerical examples to see how it all works. For the first one,
we'll use the set of genotypic values in Table 2
Table 2:
A set of perfectly additive genotypic values. Note that the
genotypic value of the heterozygote is exactly halfway between the
genotypic values of the two homozygotes.
| Genotype |
 |
 |
 |
| Genotypic value |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
For
For
,
,
,
.
You should verify for yourself that
and
for
. If you are ambitious, you could try to prove that
and
for any allele frequency.
For the second example we'll use the set of genotypic values in
Table 3.
Table 3:
A set of non-additive genotypic values. Note that the
genotypic value of the heterozygote is closer to the genotypic value
of
than it is to the genotypic value of
.
| Genotype |
 |
 |
 |
| Genotypic value |
0 |
0.8 |
2 |
|
For
To test your understanding, it would probably be useful to calculate
,
,
,
,
, and
for one or
two other allele frequencies, say
and
. Is it still
true that
and
are independent of allele
frequencies? If you are really ambitious you could try to
prove that
and
are independent of allele
frequencies if and only if
, i.e., when
heterozygotes are exactly intermediate.
Next: Bibliography
Up: Partitioning the phenotypic variance
Previous: An alternative expression for
Kent Holsinger
2008-08-27