Next: An alternative expression for
Up: Partitioning the phenotypic variance
Previous: The additive effect of
Let's assume for the moment that we can actually measure the genotypic
values. Later, we'll relax that assumption and see how to use the
resemblance among relatives to estimate the genetic components of
variance. But it's easiest to see where they come from if we assume
that the genotypic value of each genotype is known. If it is then,
writing
for
There are two terms in (7) that have a biological
(or at least a quantitative genetic) interpretation. The term on the
first line is the average squared deviation between the genotypic
value and the additive genotypic value. It will be zero only if the
effects of the alleles can be decomposed into strictly additive
components, i.e., only if the pheontype of the heterozygote is exactly
intermediate between the phenotype of the two homozygotes. Thus, it
is a measure of how much variation is due to non-additivity
(dominance) of allelic effects. In short, the dominance genetic
variance,
, is
![\begin{displaymath}
V_d = p^2[x_{11} - 2\alpha_1]^2 + 2pq[x_{12} - (\alpha_1+\alpha_2)]^2
+ q^2[x_{22} - 2\alpha_2]^2 \quad .
\end{displaymath}](img61.png) |
(8) |
Similarly, the term on the second line of (7) is the
average squared deviation between the additive genotypic value and the
mean genotypic value in the population. Thus, it is a measure of how
much variation is due to differences between genotypes in their
additive genotype. In short, the additive genetic variance,
, is
![\begin{displaymath}
V_a = p^2[2\alpha_1 - {\bar x}]^2 + 2pq[(\alpha_1 + \alpha_2) - {\bar x}]^2
+ q^2[2\alpha_2 - {\bar x}]^2 \quad .
\end{displaymath}](img63.png) |
(9) |
What about the terms on the third and fourth lines of the last
equation in 7? Well, they can be rearranged as
follows:
Where we have used the identities
[see
equation (3)] and
[see equations (4) and (5)].
In short, we have now shown that the total genotypic variance in the
population,
, can be subdivided into two components - the
additive genetic variance,
, and the dominance genetic variance,
. Specifically,
where
is given by the first line of (6),
by (9), and
by (8).
Next: An alternative expression for
Up: Partitioning the phenotypic variance
Previous: The additive effect of
Kent Holsinger
2008-08-27