Next: Summary
Up: Analyzing the genetic structure
Previous: Introduction
To make the differences in implementation and calculation clear, I'm
going to use data from 12 populations of Isotoma petraea in
southwestern Australia surveyed for genotype at GOT-1 [2] as an example throughout these
discussions (Table
).
Table 1:
Genotype counts at the
locus in Isotoma
petraea (from [2]).
| |
Genotype |
|
| Population |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Yackeyackine Soak |
29 |
0 |
0 |
1.0000 |
| Gnarlbine Rock |
14 |
3 |
3 |
0.7750 |
| Boorabbin |
15 |
2 |
3 |
0.8000 |
| Bullabulling |
9 |
0 |
0 |
1.0000 |
| Mt. Caudan |
9 |
0 |
0 |
1.0000 |
| Victoria Rock |
23 |
5 |
2 |
0.8500 |
| Yellowdine |
23 |
3 |
4 |
0.8167 |
| Wargangering |
29 |
3 |
1 |
0.9242 |
| Wagga Rock |
5 |
0 |
0 |
1.0000 |
| ``Iron Knob Major'' |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1.0000 |
| Rainy Rocks |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0.5000 |
| ``Rainy Rocks Major'' |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1.0000 |
|
Let's ignore the sampling problem for a moment and calculate the
-statistics as if we had observed the population allele frequencies
without error. They'll serve as our baseline for comparison.
Subsections
Next: Summary
Up: Analyzing the genetic structure
Previous: Introduction
Kent Holsinger
2008-08-18