... sampling).¹

The terms ``statistical sampling'' and ``genetic sampling'' are due to Weir [3].

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

... summer.²

Or you can read Holsinger and Wallace [1], which I've linked to from the course web site.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

... model.³

The good news is that to do the Bayesian analyses in this case, you don't have to write any WinBUGS code. You just have to get your data into a format that Hickory recognizes.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

....⁴

For any of you who happen to be familiar with the usual parameterization of a Beta distribution, this parameterization corresponds to setting $\nu = ((1-\theta)/\theta)\pi$ and $\omega = ((1-\theta)/\theta)(1-\pi)$.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

... [0,1]⁵

dunif(0,1) in WinBUGS notation

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

...,⁶

This isn't quite true. If you're interested, ask me about it. If you're really interested, take a look at [2].

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

... petraea.⁷

Much stronger than the evidence we had for inbreeding in the ABO blood group data, by the way.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

... populations.⁸

It's important to remember that this conclusion applies only to the locus that we analyzed. Strong differentiation at this locus need not imply that there is strong differentiation at other loci.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

... populations.⁹

And when you say it that way, it sort of makes sense, doesn't it?

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

... trace.¹⁰

You may have discovered that you can do this in WinBUGS too.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.