I apologize for not getting to this yesterday, but I just checked the Berger et al. (2010) reference, and it seems to be fine. I used the DOI and got right to the page, but here's the direct link: http://www.pnas.org/content/107/41/E157.
In case you don't know what DOIs are or how to use them, here's a brief explanation:
"DOI" stands for "digital object identifier", a system
http://dx.doi.org is the URL of the database that keeps track of DOIs. To find a specific DOI, you simply type the DOI at the end of that URL (after a "/") and it will take you there.
In case you don't know what DOIs are or how to use them, here's a brief explanation:
"DOI" stands for "digital object identifier", a system
for identifying content objects in the digital environment. DOI® names are assigned to any entity for use on digital networks. They are used to provide current information, including where they (or information about them) can be found on the Internet. Information about a digital object may change over time, including where to find it, but its DOI name will not change. (from http://www.doi.org/)The Berger et al. reference looks like this in the notes:
James Berger, Stephen Fienberg, Adrian Raftery, and Christian Robert.That last line is a DOI. To use it to get the paper simply put type the following URL into the address bar of your favorite browser:
Incoherent phylogeographic inference.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 107(41):E157-E157, 2010.
10.1073/pnas.1008762107.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1008762107
http://dx.doi.org is the URL of the database that keeps track of DOIs. To find a specific DOI, you simply type the DOI at the end of that URL (after a "/") and it will take you there.
