Next: The problem of ``natural''
Up: Problems for an environmental
Previous: Problems for an environmental
Sober [4] points out one particularly important distinction
to keep in mind: Often the things we'd like an environmental ethic to
place a value on are whole species, communities, ecosystems, or
landscapes not the individual organisms of which they are
composed.11
- Consider the question of whether to control the size of deer
populations in reserves maintained by The Nature Conservancy. Many
would agree that such management is needed to conserve the species
and communities within those reserves.
- Philosophers like Peter Singer [3] argue that we
have an ethical obligation to prevent the suffering of individual animals. On this view, management of deer populations
would be unethical if it involves any harm to individual deer, e.g.,
by allowing hunters to kill some deer, even if this harm to
individual deer was beneficial to other conservation values
associated with the preserve, and arguably even if it prevented the
suffering of other deer.
- Jane Goodall has been criticized by some conservationists for
devoting too much attention to the welfare of individual chimpanzees
and to little attention to the ``broader'' issues of ensuring that
chimpanzees have the habitat they need to survive in the wild.
Suggesting that we have a duty to a whole species, as opposed to its
individual members, is analogous to the way we often suggest that we
have a duty to a group--our department, the University, the
profession, our country--that goes beyond our obligation to the
individual members of that group. Moreover, we often recognize a
conflict between our duty to individuals and our duty to a group,
e.g., the conflict between individual liberties and national security.
So suggesting that we have a duty to protect biodiversity commits us
to conserving species, but not necessarily the individual organisms of
which they are composed. Suggesting that we have a duty to protect
ecosystems might mean that we have a duty to prevent the extinction of
the species of which it is composed, or it might mean that we have a
duty to protect the processes that structure it. In neither case is
the primary focus of concern on the welfare of individual organisms.
Next: The problem of ``natural''
Up: Problems for an environmental
Previous: Problems for an environmental
Kent Holsinger
2011-11-25