Bibliography

1

J. C. Avise and W. S. Nelson.
Molecular genetic relationships of the extinct dusky seaside sparrow.
Science, 243:646-648, 1989.

2

J. A. Clark and R. M. May.
Taxonomic bias in conservation research.
Science, 297:191-192, 2002.

3

N. J. Collar.
Taxonomy and conservation: chicken and egg.
Bulletin of the British Ornithological Council, 117:122-136, 1997.

4

B. Czech, P. R. Krausman, and R. Borkhataria.
Social construction, political power, and the allocation of benefits to endangered species.
Conservation Biology, 12:1103-1112, 1998.

5

W. W. Dimmick, M. J. Ghedotti, and D. S. Pennock.
The importance of systematic biology in defining units of conservation.
Conservation Biology, 13:653, 1999.

6

E. Mayr.
Speciation phenomena in birds.
American Naturalist, 74:249-278, 1940.

7

D. S. Pennock and W. W. Dimmick.
Critique of the evolutionarily significant unit as a definition for ``distinct population segments'' under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Conservation Biology, 11:611-619, 1997.

8

L. H. Rieseberg and D. Gerber.
Hybridization in the catalina island mountain mahogany ( Cercocarpus traskiae): RAPD evidence.
Conservation Biology, 9:199-203, 1995.

9

O. A. Ryder.
Species conservation and systematics: the dilemma of subspecies.
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 1:9-10, 1986.

10

P. S. Soltis and M. A. Gitzendanner.
Molecular systemics and the conservation of rare species.
Conservation Biology, 13:471-483, 1999.

11

R. S. Waples.
Evolutionarily significant units, distinct population segments, and the endangered species act: Reply to Pennock and Dimmick.
Conservation Biology, 12:718-721, 1998.

12

Jonathan D. S. Witt, Doug L. Threloff, and Paul D. N. Hebert.
Dna barcoding reveals extraordinary cryptic diversity in an amphipod genus: implications for desert spring conservation, 2006.