Bibliography

1

J C Avise and W S Nelson.
Molecular genetic relationships of the extinct dusky seaside sparrow.
Science, 243:646-648, 1989.

2

J A Clark and R M May.
Taxonomic bias in conservation research.
Science, 297:191-192, 2002.

3

N J Collar.
Taxonomy and conservation: chicken and egg.
Bulletin of the British Ornithological Council, 117:122-136, 1997.

4

B Czech, P R Krausman, and R Borkhataria.
Social construction, political power, and the allocation of benefits to endangered species.
Conservation Biology, 12:1103-1112, 1998.

5

W W Dimmick, M J Ghedotti, and D S Pennock.
The Importance of Systematic Biology in Defining Units of Conservation.
Conservation Biology, 13:653, 1999.

6

Jennifer A Leonard and Robert K Wayne.
Native Great Lakes wolves were not restored.
Biology Letters, 4(1):95-98, 2008.

7

E Mayr.
Speciation phenomena in birds.
American Naturalist, 74:249-278, 1940.

8

Stephen J O'Brien and Ernst Mayr.
Bureaucratic Mischief: Recognizing Endangered Species and Subspecies.
Science, 251(4998):1187-1188, 1991.

9

D S Pennock and W W Dimmick.
Critique of the evolutionarily significant unit as a definition for ``distinct population segments'' under the {U.S. Endangered Species Act}.
Conservation Biology, 11:611-619, 1997.

10

L H Rieseberg and D Gerber.
Hybridization in the Catalina Island mountain mahogany ({{$\backslash$it Cercocarpus traskiae$\backslash$/}}): {RAPD} evidence.
Conservation Biology, 9:199-203, 1995.

11

O A Ryder.
Species conservation and systematics: the dilemma of subspecies.
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 1:9-10, 1986.

12

P S Soltis and M A Gitzendanner.
Molecular Systemics and the Conservation of Rare Species.
Conservation Biology, 13:471-483, 1999.

13

R S Waples.
Evolutionarily Significant Units, Distinct Population Segments, and the Endangered Species Act: Reply to {Pennock} and {Dimmick}.
Conservation Biology, 12:718-721, 1998.

14

Jonathan D S Witt, Doug L Threloff, and Paul D N Hebert.
DNA barcoding reveals extraordinary cryptic diversity in an amphipod genus: implications for desert spring conservation.
Molecular Ecology, 15(10):3073-3082, 2006.

These notes are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 559 Nathan Abbott Way, Stanford, California 94305, USA.