Next: Hoekstra et al. [1]
Up: Case study: setting global
Previous: Myers et al. [3]
As I outlined in lecture, Kareiva and
Marvier [2] are quite critical of the
``hotspots'' approach, because it presumes that ``the exclusive goal
of conservation is to protect the largest possible number of species
in the smallest possible area.''
- They suggest ensuring that no major ecosytem suffer more than a
10% (or 20% or 50%) loss of diversity.
- An alternative to hotspot analysis focusing on vascular plant
diversity.
- Identify mammal and bird genera having more than one species,
all of which are listed by the IUCN as critically endangered,
endangered, vulnerable, or dependent on conservation.
- Ranked countries according to the number of highly threatened
genera that occur there (Figure 1.
Figure 1:
Ranking of countries according to the number of highly
threatened bird and mammal genera found within their
borders (from [2]).
|
|
Kent Holsinger