Next: Analysis
Up: Projecting global biodiversity
Previous: Expected changes in drivers
To determine the global effect of expected changes by 2100, they took
the product of the numbers in Table 1 and
Table 2 and scaled them relative to the
largest impact (Figure 1). Using the biome
level projections, allows us to make projections about how
biodiversity in each biome is likely to change under each of three
scenarios: (a) no interactions among the
drivers,4 (b) antagonistic interactions among the
drivers,5, and (c) synergistic
interactions (Figure 2)6
Table 1:
Amount of change expected in each driver of biodiversity
through 2100. 1
low, 5
high (from [6]).
|
|
Arctic |
Alpine |
Boreal |
Grass |
Savanna |
Med |
Desert |
N temp
|
S temp |
Tropical |
|
Land use |
1.0 |
1.0 |
2.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
2.0 |
1.0 |
4.0 |
5.0 |
|
Climate |
5.0 |
3.0 |
4.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
1.0 |
|
N deposition |
1.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
2.0 |
3.0 |
2.0 |
5.0 |
1.0 |
2.0 |
|
Biotic exchange |
1.0 |
1.0 |
2.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
5.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
2.0
|
2.0 |
CO |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
|
Table 2:
Impact of a unit change in each driver by 2100. See text for
description of what each unit corresponds to. 1
low, 5
high (from [6]).
|
|
Arctic |
Alpine |
Boreal |
Grass |
Savanna |
Med |
Desert |
N temp
|
S temp |
Tropical |
|
Land use |
5.0 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
|
Climate |
4.0 |
4.0 |
3.5 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
4.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
3.0 |
|
N deposition |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
1.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
1.0 |
|
Biotic exchange |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
3.0 |
2.0 |
1.5 |
3.0
|
1.5 |
CO |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.0 |
|
Figure 1:
Relative impact of changes in five global factors affecting
biodiversity. See [6] for
details.
|
|
Figure 2:
Projections of biodiversity change under three scenarios. See
text and [6] for
details.
|
|
Next: Analysis
Up: Projecting global biodiversity
Previous: Expected changes in drivers
Kent Holsinger